Man jailed for not having grass on his lawn
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:22 pm
SG Broadband Community. Everything you'd like to know about Cable Modems, DSL, Satellite, Networking, Security, Wireless, Routers and more.
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/
A nice clean working environment suits me just fine.Prey521 wrote:All women should be arrested for having grass on their lawn![]()
I ordered some of that stuff the other day... I hope it works like it said cause I have places I just can't get grass to grow and for the cost if it works its well worth the money.
Yes it does....more so than a dude keeping a loaded assault rifle laying 'round the house as if he were going to engage is some sort of urban combat.Shagster wrote:That baffles you eh?
u ahve to let us know if it works i have a few spots my selfSava700 wrote:I ordered some of that stuff the other day... I hope it works like it said cause I have places I just can't get grass to grow and for the cost if it works its well worth the money.![]()
I second this!horsemen_ wrote:u ahve to let us know if it works i have a few spots my self
downhill wrote:I looked but it doesn't mention what kind of seed is used. Really, that's important when you consider where you live.
Really it should have been a civil suit if it was a home owners association involved. If it was a city ordnance, then yes it seems silly.Izzo wrote:seriously though ....jail for dirt...c'mon
according to the article there was no association involved ...the contractor he had to build the house skipped out on sodding the lawn .....so he seeded and it didn't grow ......the article said it was an ordinance.downhill wrote:Really it should have been a civil suit if it was a home owners association involved. If it was a city ordnance, then yes it seems silly.
I'd have to know more of the story. It just seems to far fetched. There's something that the article must not be mentioning or the guy is plain lazy on two accounts. One for not getting grass to grow. It's not that hard. Two...for not getting a lawyer.
My first post was in response to the patch perfect link. I'd not buy any seed if I didn't know what it was.
You see, this is what I don't get. If the contractor was supposed to sod it, then why didn't he go after him?Izzo wrote:according to the article there was no association involved ...the contractor he had to build the house skipped out on sodding the lawn .....so he seeded and it didn't grow ......the article said it was an ordinance.
maybe ....seems to me the judge was a bit over zealous with his authority.downhill wrote:You see, this is what I don't get. If the contractor was supposed to sod it, then why didn't he go after him?
Not that in the end, I really care one way or another. Like I said, grass is easy to grow. Depending on if you actually do a little prep work to begin with.
The guy seems to be a bit lax in that he was willing to spend some time in the sack on his weekends, other than trying grow a lawn. He should have just planted zoyosia plugs and pissed everyone off.
well for 19$+7 shipping I couldn't resist trying it.. its no more costly than a big bag of grass seed that wouldn't work time and time again.horsemen_ wrote:u ahve to let us know if it works i have a few spots my self
i have been getting a massive amount of spam for that stuff and i have no idea whyPrey521 wrote:All women should be arrested for having grass on their lawn
BTW, homeboy needed some of this right here:
http://www.patchperfect.com/
A cactus field would save water.lonewolfz28 wrote:Half of my old neighborhood in north-central TX could've been jailed under that ordinance.![]()
Kinda hard to grow anything on sunbaked clay without running up a couple thousand just in water bills.![]()
trogers wrote:A cactus field would save water.
Sentence that judge to spend 52 weekends in Texas and he will grow new ideas in his head...lonewolfz28 wrote:Yup, but I doubt it would meet this judge's idea of a 'yard'.![]()
![]()
Most definitely!trogers wrote:Sentence that judge to spend 52 weekends in Texas and he will grow new ideas in his head...![]()