The universe
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 5:38 am
How do you believe that the universe came about?
SG Broadband Community. Everything you'd like to know about Cable Modems, DSL, Satellite, Networking, Security, Wireless, Routers and more.
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/
deep question... I cant even begin to answer that. Thanks for the thought provoking Q though. +1saved wrote:How do you believe that the universe came about?
Why would you apologize for expressing your opinion? Don't worry as long as you respect other opinions IMO dont need to apologize.Demantik wrote:seeing as the steps of life exist in comets, it wouldn't be a long shot to say a comet hit the earth many years ago.
I believe there is a god or a 'higher power' but not to the extend that Christians beleive today, sorry if i offended anyone.
History has shown that some people get upset when someone expresses a personal opinion that differs from theirs. Demantik is probably apologizing in advance of criticism that might be thrown his way.Ghosthunter wrote:Why would you apologize for expressing your opinion? Don't worry as long as you respect other opinions IMO dont need to apologize.
The option I believe in isn't up there.saved wrote:How do you believe that the universe came about?
Brent,Brent wrote:The option I believe in isn't up there.
We know from the Bible that a day in God's eyes is not a Day in humans eyes.
So it wasn't literally six human days.
It could have been six thousand, 10 thousand, 1 million years, whatever.
But it was God that made it, he was the "Big Bang" so to speak.
Then after he created it I believe the world evolved on its own, he started it, and then let it become its own thing.
As for Humans, I believe in creation, he created us, Adam and Eve etc...
By that I assume you are speaking of total evolution outside of any intervention from a Creator. If that be the case and it is a theory that some people hold then what you believe is that everything came from nothingYARDofSTUF wrote:So many endless possibilities.
But I would guess that space was formed by some anomalie and from there stars and planets formed and die as we know now.
Maybe space itself is growing, maybe it wasnt so vast at first.
In your opinion.........and thats all it is ...an opinion...unless of course you have proof?saved wrote: The possibility of evolution taking place without a Creator is exactly the same as the possibility of a hurricane blowing through a junk yard and assembling a 747.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
John wrote:So it is possible.
So... when I hear a newsflash like this:saved wrote:The possibility of evolution taking place without a Creator is exactly the same as the possibility of a hurricane blowing through a junk yard and assembling a 747.
Burke wrote:Created in 6 days, God rested on the 7th.
Theistic evolution.
Paft wrote:Evolution.
It is a totally evolutionary thing without any God
DittoBurke wrote:Created in 6 days, God rested on the 7th.
Theistic evolution.
No an opinion is something that has supposition without actual evidence. This is fact. There is no possibility for a hurricane to assemble a 747 and there is no possibility for everything to come from nothing on its own.Rainbow wrote:In your opinion.........and thats all it is ...an opinion...unless of course you have proof?![]()
Obviously, if your proof was as solid as you believe it to be, you wouldn't need to try and convince anyone, now would you?saved wrote:No an opinion is something that has supposition without actual evidence. This is fact. There is no possibility for a hurricane to assemble a 747 and there is no possibility for everything to come from nothing on its own.![]()
SRF01 wrote:It is "technically" possible for 2 solid objects to pass through one another, given that the molicules were aligned perfectly.
So I would think that it is "technically" possible for a hurrican to assemble a 747.
SRF01 wrote:It is "technically" possible for 2 solid objects to pass through one another, given that the molicules were aligned perfectly.
So I would think that it is "technically" possible for a hurrican to assemble a 747.
Yes there are many who are blind.stevebakh wrote:Obviously, if your proof was as solid as you believe it to be, you wouldn't need to try and convince anyone, now would you?
Actually, you are wrong. It is technically possible. When you look at the molecular level, we're made more of space than we are of matter. There are gabs between each atom and the space around each one by which electrons orbit the nucleus. In fact, I believe that neutrinos can pass straight through solid matter, even passing straight through our planet. This is basic chemistry.saved wrote:No it is not possible for two solid objects to pass through each other. Not in any situation. That is science fiction.![]()
![]()
![]()
The proof is in the fact that it is impossible. Stating that something is does not make it so. There is absolutely no scientific proof to back up your claim. Like those who claim that everything came from nothing on its own which is ridicules since "nothingness" does not have "its own," since it does not exist the idea that a solid can pass through another solid is false. It has to be first reduced to something other then a solid to accomplish the act.stevebakh wrote:Actually, you are wrong. It is technically possible. When you look at the molecular level, we're made more of space than we are of matter. There are gabs between each atom and the space around each one by which electrons orbit the nucleus. In fact, I believe that neutrinos can pass straight through solid matter, even passing straight through our planet. This is basic chemistry.![]()
It's also funny, whilst you believe non-believers are blind, non-believers believe that you are blind. So really - whilst you have as much faith in your belief, someone else doesn't. I think that you're as blind as you probably believe me to be. So who's right? It's impossible to decide such a thing. You can only justify your belief in your own mind.![]()
There is absolutely no scientific proof of many things... to include the existence of God. Individual faith in the existence of God is the only thing that supports the existence of God. This poll is thus a philosophical debate that has no answer. Philosophical debates don’t require proof of claims.saved wrote:There is absolutely no scientific proof to back up your claim.
I'm looking at this and see someting you might have missed...."as" isn't an absolute term. As is clear on these fourms...people tend to talk in generalisms.saved wrote:Brent,
the bible does not teach what you have said. It does say in Peter that a thousand years is as a day to the Lord. However even if one took that literal as for the creation you could not get millions of years. Only an extra 6 thousand years, one thousand for each creation day mentioned.
Why would you need a watch to undersand a concept of time?Remember they did not have timex watches when the account was given and they determind time by the daylight hours and the night time hours, so scriptuure was give in terms that anyone could undertand.
Maybe it was an early blunder and the writer ment planets....Finally in the account if you read it carefully you will see that the plants were created one day before the sun. They could not have survied without the sunlight for many days much less years.
saved wrote:Brent,
the bible does not teach what you have said. It does say in Peter that a thousand years is as a day to the Lord. However even if one took that literal as for the creation you could not get millions of years. Only an extra 6 thousand years, one thousand for each creation day mentioned.
The Creator has always been. he is self existing and has no beginning. The universe cannot be eternal since any such idea would violate the second law of thermal dynamics. And yes it is far fetched to believe thta everything came from nothing and then evolved.stevebakh wrote:Now let's STAY with that train of thought and apply it again, to your own beliefs. Who created your creator? It's a simple question. If you believe that your creator is "eternal" then why is it so far fetched to believe that the universe is eteranal in itself.
So please, using your own train of thought, explain where your creator came from. How was he created and so who created your creators creator?![]()
Actuallt that would be incorrect. The creation time line is only a six day period and if one wanted to claim that the days are years there was only six mentioned in the creation. The 7th was not a creation day. Even if one were to hold the view that there was 6 thousand years of creation instead of a literal 6 day creation it would mean nothing in the scheme of things when debating the timeline claimed by some as billions of years. However the text is clear in that it means literal days.YARDofSTUF wrote:and he rested on teh 7th, so thats an extra 7,000 years![]()
exactlyGhosthunter wrote:well the earth has been around for what billions of years? and we know dinosuars were here way before man was...so something does not add up in those 6 days or 6,000 years.
Just remember people use to believe the earth was flat/
i believe in science anyday over a book that was written 2,000 years ago when they did not have science like we do with all our modern technology.