What really happened to WTC building 7
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:31 pm
I had to click the link... now my ip is logged with the fbi, cia, and everyone else.
SG Broadband Community
SG Broadband Community. Everything you'd like to know about Cable Modems, DSL, Satellite, Networking, Security, Wireless, Routers and more.
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/
What really happened to WTC building 7
Page 1 of 1
Re: What really happened to WTC building 7
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 3:27 pm
I had to click the link... now my ip is logged with the fbi, cia, and everyone else.
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 3:34 pm
Geez, I wonder if those guy's have any new information on J.F.K's assasination?! 
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 3:49 pm
Why does it matter whether it was done on purpose or not?
Re: Re: What really happened to WTC building 7
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:13 pm
not likely.Originally posted by iaus10
I had to click the link... now my ip is logged with the fbi, cia, and everyone else.
however, your IP is logged on SG, are you worried?
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:51 pm
I told everyone here what happened, and nobody came after ME.
Nobody believed me either. That was on my side.
If I were to get "visitors" for what I posted, it wouldn't go over to well with the press.
Truth is harder to swallow than lies, never forget that.
Nobody believed me either. That was on my side.
If I were to get "visitors" for what I posted, it wouldn't go over to well with the press.
Truth is harder to swallow than lies, never forget that.
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:52 pm
Originally posted by Prey521
Why does it matter whether it was done on purpose or not?
That's what I'm wondering.
Insurance ?
Re: What really happened to WTC building 7
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:01 pm
what really happened to WTC B7, cleary I see that the building was destroyed. Whether for profit or not.
**snippit**
"How Did Larry Silverstein Benefit from the Collapse of Building 7?"
"In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. So: This building's collapse resulted in a profit of about $500 million!" -$25 million if my calculation is right.. $475 Million
But thats not really all that much.. The location of the building talks money. So to rebuild that same building in the same location would cost nearly $1 billion +/- 80 Million. (If you consider inflation)
In a way, Silverstein played his cards right, and got back his money invested in the building. but its definately a loss in my book.
The building being destroyed = loss
The time waiting for its rebuild = loss
The money that could be generated as profits for the buildings services= loss
Much so lets not forget to include, he will never recover fully from this incident. =loss
when he is rewarded 861 mill to rebuild that doesn't really mean profit to me, it means that he is gonna rebuild.
peace,
UnitedWeStand
Re: Re: Re: What really happened to WTC building 7
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:00 pm
Originally posted by UnitedWeStand
not likely.
however, your IP is logged on SG, are you worried?
A little
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:54 pm
Wow.
Are they forgetting that two jumbo jets travelling way above their normal speed of sound crashed into the buildings?
It's like the Pentagon. All these conspiracy theorists think that because there wasn't all bits of plane wreckage and explosions on the outside there was no damage.
When a 200 ton plane carrying 91,000 litres of aviation grade fuel hits a building at high speed, the plane and all the fuel goes *into* the building. Just because you can't see it all from the outside doesn't mean that 200 tons of plane and 91,000 litres of fuel has dissapeared.
Anything that's not destroyed by said 200 tonnes of metal, burns shortly thereafter. I can't get why people refuse to believe that.
Are they forgetting that two jumbo jets travelling way above their normal speed of sound crashed into the buildings?
It's like the Pentagon. All these conspiracy theorists think that because there wasn't all bits of plane wreckage and explosions on the outside there was no damage.
When a 200 ton plane carrying 91,000 litres of aviation grade fuel hits a building at high speed, the plane and all the fuel goes *into* the building. Just because you can't see it all from the outside doesn't mean that 200 tons of plane and 91,000 litres of fuel has dissapeared.
Anything that's not destroyed by said 200 tonnes of metal, burns shortly thereafter. I can't get why people refuse to believe that.