are these good benchmarks??
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2003 9:22 pm
tried some overclocking, kinda a newbie at oc", everything seems to run fine.
I'd say so. Specs?
SG Broadband Community
SG Broadband Community. Everything you'd like to know about Cable Modems, DSL, Satellite, Networking, Security, Wireless, Routers and more.
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/
are these good benchmarks??
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2003 9:27 pm
I'd say so. Specs?
specs
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2003 9:34 pm
actually Burke, i;m joking, no way i could ever get this, i saw this at a site once where a guy had his comp cooled down within a freezer or liquid nitrogen or something, he had detailed pics , etc it was legit. I;ll try to find it again, and give ya the link. Thought it might raise a few eyebrows though...
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:12 pm
the 3dmark scores were not obtained by running it at default settings..but the oc looks nice
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2003 7:46 pm
how did he unlock the 2.4? That is not the default multiplier
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2003 7:57 pm
Originally posted by Cameron203
how did he unlock the 2.4? That is not the default multiplier
Either an Engineering sample or its chopped.
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2003 9:52 pm
Originally posted by Cameron203
how did he unlock the 2.4? That is not the default multiplier
24 is the multiplier for the 2.4a or 400mhz fsb chip...so that is the right multiplier for that chip...he just got a 63% o/c with it by upping the fsb from 100 to 163
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2003 11:34 pm
Hello all, Nice to be here. But... Thats a joke right?
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2003 1:17 am
yeah i was like HOLY MOTHER OF perl thats a tight 3dmark score!!!!
-Preet
-Preet
its real
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2003 1:22 am
no its not a joke, wish i could find the site, i think it was from australian overclockers.com, i will post the link if i can find the article again, it was done in almost lab-like conditions, he had the comp encased in very cold tempature.