Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:24 pm
by jeremyboycool
Roody wrote:
Imagine how Leatherneck felt when you insulted him. God knows he handled it far better then you have handled being told you insulted him.
I know, I am such a demon.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:26 pm
by Roody
jeremyboycool wrote:Roody, if you were not a mod, I would put you on my ignore list.
You have little problem dinging others for being rude, but when you get called on it you get all bent of shape calling about how you are being insulted. Treat people the way you want to be treated and perhaps you won't find people pointing out your double standards in a thread.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:27 pm
by jeremyboycool
Roody wrote:You have little problem dinging others for being rude, but when you get called on it you get all bent of shape calling about how you are being insulted. Treat people the way you want to be treated and perhaps you won't find people pointing out your double standards in a thread.
That's nice. Glad we could talk.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:27 pm
by Roody
jeremyboycool wrote:I know, I am such a demon.
Not a demon, but you are undoubtedly being a hypocrite in this thread.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:28 pm
by jeremyboycool
Roody wrote:Not a demon, but you are undoubtedly being a hypocrite in this thread.
Is it that you are still butt hurt about our altercation?

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:29 pm
by Roody
jeremyboycool wrote:Is it that you are still butt hurt about our altercation?
What altercation are you speaking about?

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:37 pm
by jeremyboycool
Roody wrote:What altercation are you speaking about?
Listen, I'll be honest with you, I do like you as a person, but clearly we have some conflicting grounds. And when you go on and on like this I really want to have nothing to do you with. I can't put you on ignore and clearly you don't respect that. It would be nice if you just left me alone.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:38 pm
by Humboldt
jeremyboycool wrote:Is it that you are still butt hurt about our altercation?
Wow, the maturity level just plummeted around here.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:40 pm
by jeremyboycool
Humboldt wrote:Wow, the maturity level just plummeted around here.
I was not aware it could get any lower.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:44 pm
by Humboldt
jeremyboycool wrote:I was not aware it could get any lower.
uh huh

Without picking sides, everything said here so far has been relatively civil and respectful. With that last comment civility and respectfulness went out the door.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:45 pm
by Roody
jeremyboycool wrote:Listen, I'll be honest with you, I do like you as a person, but clearly we have some conflicting grounds. And when you go on and on like this I really want to have nothing to do you with. I can't put you on ignore and clearly you don't respect that. It would be nice if you just left me alone.
Jeremy it has nothing to do with me not respecting you. I do think you have been hypocritical in this thread, but then everyone at some point or another (Myself certainly included) has been hypocritical at some point in their lives. The point I was making is Leatherneck has handled himself very well in this thread regardless of your reading comment.

Clearly you think you and I had an altercation in the past that led to your question. Forgive me if I don't recall every altercation as you put it that I had with someone.

As for talking to you I'm not going to go silent just because you don't like something that I say. I certainly have no desire to pick fights with you or anyone else for the sake of picking fights, but this is a public forum and if a topic comes up that I want to participate in I will. If that means responding to something you say then I will do that also. If that's a problem for you then SG probably isn't the place for you.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:53 pm
by jeremyboycool
Humboldt wrote:uh huh

Without picking sides, everything said here so far has been relatively civil and respectful. With that last comment civility and respectfulness went out the door.
Please...

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:55 pm
by jeremyboycool
Roody wrote:Jeremy it has nothing to do with me not respecting you. I do think you have been hypocritical in this thread, but then everyone at some point or another (Myself certainly included) has been hypocritical at some point in their lives. The point I was making is Leatherneck has handled himself very well in this thread regardless of your reading comment.

Clearly you think you and I had an altercation in the past that led to your question. Forgive me if I don't recall every altercation as you put it that I had with someone.

As for talking to you I'm not going to go silent just because you don't like something that I say. I certainly have no desire to pick fights with you or anyone else for the sake of picking fights, but this is a public forum and if a topic comes up that I want to participate in I will. If that means responding to something you say then I will do that also. If that's a problem for you then SG probably isn't the place for you.

I don't care Roody. I just simply do not care what you have to say. You are just wasting your breath on me.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:57 pm
by Humboldt
jeremyboycool wrote:Please...
For such a truth-seeker you sure have a high opinion of yourself compared to others.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:01 pm
by Roody
jeremyboycool wrote:I don't care Roody. I just simply do not care what you have to say. You are just wasting your breath on me.
If you don't care then quit responding like you do. After all like it's been pointed out it's your words that took this from being a civil conversation to something far more immature. JawZ, humboldt, Leatherneck and I have all pointed out your tone in this thread yet you keep sticking by the idea that it's only you being picked on.

As for me I don't get all that fired up by your words after what I just read a few minutes ago that reminded me of this supposed altercation. In a reputation comment you told me
I know I can be a jackass.
I never really had much of a thought on that, but I guess you would know yourself better then most.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:06 pm
by jeremyboycool
Humboldt wrote:For such a truth-seeker you sure have a high opinion of yourself compared to others.
I am not a truth-seeker, never have been and never will be. And I actually have a very low opinion of myself when comparing to others.

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:07 pm
by jeremyboycool
Roody wrote:If you don't care then quit responding like you do. After all like it's been pointed out it's your words that took this from being a civil conversation to something far more immature. JawZ, humboldt, Leatherneck and I have all pointed out your tone in this thread yet you keep sticking by the idea that it's only you being picked on.

As for me I don't get all that fired up by your words after what I just read a few minutes ago that reminded me of this supposed altercation. In a reputation comment you told me I never really had much of a thought on that, but I guess you would know yourself better then most.
"If you don't care then quit responding "

I said I don't care what you have to say. I do care that you know I don't care.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:26 am
by JawZ
Wow, this thread went to hell in a hand basket.

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:07 pm
by Mutch
Im released from jail and suddenly im better then everyone else.

:rotfl: :rotfl:

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:54 pm
by m3izero
not clear,ask him directly
:D

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:54 pm
by Chris
JawZ wrote:Wow, this thread went to hell in a hand basket.
I had to re read this thread 3 times to know what a hand basket was.
JBC realy need to take the red pill....Or was that the blue pill...Damn, gots to read the thread again now....Grrrrr!!!!

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:01 pm
by Xpunge
Mutch wrote:Im released from jail and suddenly im better then everyone else.

:rotfl: :rotfl:

Who went to jail?

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:19 am
by Mad_Haggis
Leatherneck wrote:So you can tell me I have a "Gross misunderstanding" and should read a book, but the term "cloudy concept" is unacceptable? Something askew here.
That's gross?