SG Broadband Community

YARDofSTUF wrote:Apparently debbie does discriminate cuz Burke got infractions for the ass pic and thats no worse than others that have been posted in the past.

lame

Debbie wrote:I'll stay out of your crappy give back threads. If what you post is beyond PG13 and it gets pulled, don't blame it on me.

I dont post images beyond a PG13 rating and the one in this thread wasnt either.

YARDofSTUF wrote:No i'm not kidding apparently following the forum gidelines of posting PG13 images isnt enough, if we want to post them in any thread we want we seem to need debbie's approval.

If Philip approved, he would have not pulled the pic.

Debbie wrote:If Philip approved, he would have not pulled the pic.

Again I would throw that up to member bias.

EDIT: I think you were jsut pissy cuz you views the pic on your work PC and the thread didnt have a NWS tag.

YARDofSTUF wrote:No i'm not kidding apparently following the forum gidelines of posting PG13 images isnt enough, if we want to post them in any thread we want we seem to need debbie's approval.

I think the pic was fine. I came twice already.
I'm confused

Call it what you want...............I'm out of here.

Debbie wrote:Call it what you want...............I'm out of here.

I figured that, you hardly ever hang around to explain yourself or anything like that.

YARDofSTUF wrote:I figured that, you hardly ever hang around to explain yourself or anything like that.

Not justifying myself to you. or anyone else for that matter.

opcorn:

This is a sign

Debbie wrote:Not justifying myself to you. or anyone else for that matter.

Repost.

YARDofSTUF wrote:Repost.

and don't forget it.

Brent wrote: opcorn:

Do you mind sharing dude.
Gosh so rude.

Here is another one

don't think it's bias. Randy's last post in the speedguide membership thread was yanked completly. I don't remember the girl he posted too well because I have a habit of not remembering my dreams...but as I recall it was about the same nakedness as burkes.

Noevo wrote:don't think it's bias. Randy's last post in the speedguide membership thread was yanked completly. I don't remember the girl he posted too well because I have a habit of not remembering my dreams...but as I recall it was about the same nakedness as burkes.

Actaully randy's chick had ther underwear fully on, but thats not really the thread for that type of stuff.

Noevo wrote:don't think it's bias. Randy's last post in the speedguide membership thread was yanked completly. I don't remember the girl he posted too well because I have a habit of not remembering my dreams...but as I recall it was about the same nakedness as burkes.

Would this be better?

whoa!

I accept!

Mmmmm... Anne Hathaway.

jeremyboycool wrote:This is a sign

YARDofSTUF wrote:Actaully randy's chick had ther underwear fully on, but thats not really the thread for that type of stuff.

it was kind of in your face though, I think the picture has something to do with it. I don't think you can actually throw a blanket over all of them and say they had the same amount of clothes on so their the same. Just my opinion though.

and yes, I liked both pictures and reported neither.

mountainman wrote:[http://z.about.com/d/homerepair/1/0/s/-/-/-/hammer.jpg

http://www.backyardcity.com/images/inf/ ... 92TCH.jpg]

mm

jeremyboycool wrote:

and

Insulting and baiting posts removed except for some of Yard’s and Debbie’s. Still trying to figure out what to do about it.

Locked as well since the essence of the thread seems to have been lost.