SG Broadband Community. Everything you'd like to know about Cable Modems, DSL, Satellite, Networking, Security, Wireless, Routers and more.
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/0 ... tml?hpt=T2Indonesia hit by 6.4-magnitude earthquake!!
From the link you posted:
OMG!!There were no immediate reports of injuries, deaths, or damages on the island nation.
Your ignoring the fact of a STRONG EARTHQUAKE! Sure there is no damage but it still reflects the rise in recent strong to intense earthquakes!Humboldt wrote:From the link you posted:
OMG!!
Why the drama?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/ ... ?tag=stackStrong Earthquake Rocks Central Japan
Still means a magnitude 6.6 Quake has hit in a very small amount of time!Magnitude 6.6 Quake Sways Buildings in Capital, No Immediate Reports of Damage or Casualties
Magnitude 4.4 earthquake rattles Southern California
A magnitude-4.4 earthquake rattled residents of southern California early Tuesday morning, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
and yet, in the scheme of things, there's been no increase at allSava700 wrote:I really don't care what the historical data of over 1million years has shown, in the last several months there has been a major swing in strong quakes that have been enough to spark a news posting about it.
A 5.6-magnitude earthquake shook Cuba on Saturday.
The quake struck at 1:08 p.m. (2:08 p.m. ET) 22 kilometers (14 miles) below the surface and was centered 44 km (27 miles) south-southwest of Guantanamo, the U.S. Geological Survey said.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/ ... tml?hpt=T2
"Lets look beyond the history of 2 million years, but look at the most recent 2 years!"Sava700 wrote:AND YET AGAIN... in the over all look within the last 2 years alone! Lets look beyond the history of 2 million years, but look at the most recent 2 years!
Roody wrote:[YOUTUBE]-XTwWqzKeXc[/YOUTUBE]
I can and I will... I'll look at these last 2 years against the 2 years before that, those first 2 years didn't have anything near the amount we have now nor the destruction they have caused. To be honest it sounds as if your not really wanting to add anything to this discussion beyond trying to troll responses as usual.jeremyboycool wrote:"Lets look beyond the history of 2 million years, but look at the most recent 2 years!"
You can not determine what is abnormal activity by only looking at the pass two years.
He's being melodramatic in hopes of getting people riled up.jeremyboycool wrote:"Lets look beyond the history of 2 million years, but look at the most recent 2 years!"
You can not determine what is abnormal activity by only looking at the pass two years.
Sava700 wrote:I can and I will... I'll look at these last 2 years against the 2 years before that, those first 2 years didn't have anything near the amount we have now nor the destruction they have caused. To be honest it sounds as if your not really wanting to add anything to this discussion beyond trying to troll responses as usual.
You would prob have more fun in this thread
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=269396
He must be getting something from it. I find it hard to believe that anyone, even Sava, actually thinks the line of reasoning he is putting forth is valid.Roody wrote:He's being melodramatic in hopes of getting people riled up.
No personal attacks..just stating the truth. I don't wish to argue either, just stating what is being posted on current events not past as in millions of years ago.jeremyboycool wrote: The fact that you resort to personal attacks everything I post in this thread only proves to me that you have no actual rational arguments.
How many earthquakes do you normally witness within you?Sava700 wrote:No personal attacks..just stating the truth. I don't wish to argue either, just stating what is being posted on current events not past as in millions of years ago.
Sure are alot more Earthquakes than I've normally seen, I as in me
In real life Sava is Roland Emmerich. He has witnessed every major disaster in history.YARDofSTUF wrote:How many earthquakes do you normally witness within you?
You know I was not referring to your comments on the earthquakes.Sava700 wrote:No personal attacks..
His disagreeing with you doesn't qualify as trolling, Sava.Sava700 wrote: To be honest it sounds as if your not really wanting to add anything to this discussion beyond trying to troll responses as usual.
Code: Select all
Magnitude.................total
8.0-9.9.......................1
7.0-7.9......................14
6.0-6.9.....................222
5.0-5.9....................2685
4.0-4.9....................6523
3.0-3.9....................1708
2.0-2.9....................2523
1.0-1.9......................32
0.1-0.9.......................0
No Magnitude.................28
Total # of quakes.........13736
Nice post Indy.Indy wrote:We're actually on a pace to have less earthquakes this year. If you look at the stats from the USGS website, of which this chart is from:
You'll see that these are the number of earthquakes as of today. Now, extrapolating the numbers for the rest of the year, you get the following totals:
I'm no mathematician, but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that we'll have fewer quakes this year than we've had in the previous decade.Code: Select all
Magnitude.................total 8.0-9.9.......................1 7.0-7.9......................14 6.0-6.9.....................222 5.0-5.9....................2685 4.0-4.9....................6523 3.0-3.9....................1708 2.0-2.9....................2523 1.0-1.9......................32 0.1-0.9.......................0 No Magnitude.................28 Total # of quakes.........13736
There have been more deaths so far this year, but that's entirely due to the fact that you had a massive earthquake hit a high density population area that was not equipped to deal with an earthquake, and not due to an upswing in the number of earthquakes (which there aren't).
There is something about links posted supporting information and people with screen names starting with Sa that disregard such information.Humboldt wrote:Nice post Indy.
You must, however, take into consideration that Sava>USGS and that he refused to look at the previous excerpts from their site, which disgreed with him. Information that, btw, you just backed up completely
Naw nice post indeed, I'll review the data for a while and continue to post when a quake happens.Humboldt wrote:Nice post Indy.
You must, however, take into consideration that Sava>USGS and that he refused to look at the previous excerpts from their site, which disgreed with him. Information that, btw, you just backed up completely
An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 6.4 has struck near the Andaman Islands, in the Indian Ocean, on Tuesday, the U.S. Geological Survey said.
Actually not out of the ordinary at all.
Strong earthquake hits Baja California
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/ ... tml?hpt=T2A magnitude 6.9 earthquake struck Baja California in northwestern Mexico on Sunday, shaking the ground at least as far away as Los Angeles, California, the U.S. Geological Survey and witnesses reported.
The quake struck at 3:40 p.m. PT and was centered about 175 kilometers (110 miles) east-southeast of Tijuana, according to the USGS.
Chandeliers swung and water sloshed around in swimming pools in the Los Angeles suburbs, witnesses reported, while posters to Twitter reported feeling the quake in Phoenix, Arizona.
yeah something strange is happening here lately!Easto wrote: Definately not the ordinary quake.
opcorn: Seismologists have raised the preliminary magnitude of an earthquake in northern Baja California in Mexico from 6.9 to 7.2.
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/04/06/us ... ra/?hpt=T2The temblor struck 145 miles off the coast of northern Sumatra, Indonesia, at a depth of 28.6 miles, the U.S. Geological Survey reported.
source? Asking cos I want to read.JawZ wrote:The notion that all of these incidents are related is beginning to pick up pace in the scientific communities.
.
9mmprincess wrote:source? Asking cos I want to read.
trying to decide whether to read this as attitude or not. I was just curious, is all.JawZ wrote:uhhh...mainstream news? It was all over CNN yesterday as they were reporting on the Indonesia quake. [/i]
I'll check out the link.Simply put...the quake activity is part of a cluster, which is part of a cycle, which can be viewed as a trend. As energy is built up along one tectonic plate and is released...it places stress on all the other plates. this is completely normal as we are sitting on crust which is floating on top of a molten core.
The recent eruption of the Eyjafjallajokull volcano in Iceland may be a warning of bigger things to come in the mid-atlantic region. Look closely at the fault lines of the mid-atlantic...
http://www.geology.wisc.edu/~chuck/MORV ... titialskip
Stress is being released east and west of the mid-atlantic.
This Worst case scenario could play out something smaller or larger, I truly believe we are on the verge of something major in the near future and within my lifetime - 2012? who knows, but the recent amount of activity surely suggests something is going on over the norm.JawZ wrote: Worst case scenario...Cumbre Vieja erupts and falls into the Atlantic this summer...the East Coast is blindsided at the peak of summer beach vacation season.
JawZ wrote:The notion that all of these incidents are related is beginning to pick up pace in the scientific communities.
With the recent volcanic eruption in Iceland, it looks like there are major tectonic shifts taking place.
Worst case scenario...Cumbre Vieja erupts and falls into the Atlantic this summer...the East Coast is blindsided at the peak of summer beach vacation season.
The recent incidents are part of a trend...jeremyboycool wrote:
"The notion that all of these incidents are related"
We already know that earthquakes (along with volcanic activity) are related to each other.
9mmprincess wrote:Someone's been talking to Lloyd the bartender...