Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Alternative to 192.168.1.x?

  1. #1

    Question Alternative to 192.168.1.x?

    I was just wondering if there is an alternative to using the 192.168.1.x addy scheme for my inside network. I have three PCs connected to a Linksys 4port Cable/DSL router that connects to an ISA server then to my cable modem. I thought maybe 10.33.1.x but I'm not sure what subnet mask to use for the router. It only gives afew choices with the new firmware upgrade.

    Any suggestions for a scheme anyone??

    Much appreciated

  2. #2
    SG Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    These are the private address ranges:

    169.254.0. 0

    You can determine the netmask by looking at the high end of each range. Everywhere you see a "255" substitute a "0". Everywhere you see any other number substitute a "255". So the netmask for a (subnets not withstanding) 10.x.x.x machine is That means the first octet represents the network and the last 3 represent the host. The more digits reservered for the host (zeros in a netmask), the more machines you can have on the same network.


    Edit: The range you use is completely up to you. All of these addresses are non-routable so none is really better than the other. The only reason to be to picky is the number of machines you have on the network. the 192 range allows 65000 hosts. The 10 range offers 16 million. Unless you are a large corporation it really doesn't matter.
    anything is possible - nothing is free

    Quote Originally Posted by Blisster
    It *would* be brokeback bay if I in fact went and hung out with Skye and co (did I mention he is teh hotness?)

  3. #3
    I just talked to one of our admins where I work and he gave me the run down as well. I appreciate the reply.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts