Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Mobile 7500 Beats Mobile GF4

  1. #1
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    vancouver, wa
    Posts
    797

    Mobile 7500 Beats Mobile GF4


  2. #2
    Certified SG Addict Brent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Posts
    42,163
    the test isn't fair, the R7500 has a higher cpu clock advantage

    also it seems he may have a problem with his gf4 440 there, the multi-texturing seems a little low, in fact a lot low, i wonder what driver version he's using on it, he doesn't specify

    all in all i do not think this test is a fair test and not enough info regarding setup/drivers etc...
    "Would you mind not standing on my chest, my hats on fire." - The Doctor

  3. #3
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    vancouver, wa
    Posts
    797
    Considering it's in another language, you really can't tell what the person is trying to say

    Anyway, I don't give a crap about 3DMark. Just one of the worst benchmarks ever.

  4. #4
    Certified SG Addict Brent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Posts
    42,163
    Originally posted by MartialArtist12
    Considering it's in another language, you really can't tell what the person is trying to say

    Anyway, I don't give a crap about 3DMark. Just one of the worst benchmarks ever.
    only the ATI fanatics say that

    cause your cards suck! lmao j/k
    "Would you mind not standing on my chest, my hats on fire." - The Doctor

  5. #5
    Forum Techie terrancelam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Toronto, Canada Computers Built and Fixed personally: 720
    Posts
    5,465

    hmmm

    language smanguage. Here is the link in english:

    http://translate.google.com/translat...language_tools
    Intel Core 2 Duo Q8300 2.55Ghz (1333mhz)
    Asus P5N-D
    OCZ Platinum 8gb (2x2gb) PC8000 1000mhz 5-5-5-18
    EVGA 460GTX 1gb PCIE 2.0
    Western Digital Black 640gb x 2 Raid 0
    Coolermaster 1000W Modular PSU
    Antec NSK4480B
    Windows 7 Professional 64-bit

    ----------------------------------------------------------
    HP TC5700 (Thin Client) 1ghz, 512mb 80gb 1x1000mb NIC 1x100mb NIC running PFSense 1.22
    Linksys WRT-150 running DD-WRT V.24 (Access Point)

    "SG Techies rule!" - Sig Buddies with Amro

  6. #6
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    vancouver, wa
    Posts
    797
    Originally posted by Brent


    only the ATI fanatics say that

    cause your cards suck! lmao j/k
    Is that why it is ranked #1?

  7. #7
    Flip Chip Qwijib0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona Processor: GenuineIntel Member #4896
    Posts
    8,269
    Originally posted by Brent


    only the ATI fanatics say that

    cause your cards suck! lmao j/k
    hey!... SOMEBODY's pixel tapesty II envy!

    If your browser can't read unicode, you should probably switch!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •