Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Comodo or Outpost uses less PC power?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    questor
    Guest

    Comodo or Outpost uses less PC power?

    I want to use Comodo or Outpost Firewall Free. Which one uses less PC power under
    XP?











  2. #2
    Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
    Guest

    Re: Comodo or Outpost uses less PC power?

    In comp.security.firewalls questor <questor@home.com> wrote:
    > I want to use Comodo or Outpost Firewall Free. Which one uses less PC
    > power under XP?


    The Windows Firewall.

    cu
    59cobalt
    --
    "If a software developer ever believes a rootkit is a necessary part of
    their architecture they should go back and re-architect their solution."
    --Mark Russinovich

  3. #3
    AlleyCat
    Guest

    Re: Comodo or Outpost uses less PC power?

    In article <4fc395a6b9379712be46ba5730a912ea@rip.ax.lt>, questor@home.com
    says...
    > I want to use Comodo or Outpost Firewall Free. Which one uses less PC power under
    > XP?


    Using Outpost. All of the Outpost processes total <19k. Don't know what Comodo
    does, but...

    http://forums.lunarsoft.net/topic/42...ll-discussion/

    I am NOT a part of this forum, but Comodo, IMO, is dubious at best, intrusive,
    in the least. I would go with something that has the least amount of user
    negatives and not listen to someone who touts it... i.e., Bear Bottoms. Why on
    earth would anyone push others towards software?..., unless they have a vested
    interest in said software. Some may "push" you toward certain software with
    good advice, but some around here seem to be advancing their intellect, by
    endorsing a product. Hey other geeks and freaks... I recommend this software
    because it's good... that makes ME look smart! lol Puhleeze!

    Al

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •