Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

  1. #21
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:

    > http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
    >>>
    >>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)

    >>
    >> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.

    >
    > Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
    >
    > *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
    >
    >> I grow for other people, not myself..

    >
    > Very kind.
    >
    >> yeah I smoke the weed...

    >
    > Very noticeable.
    >
    >> so ****ing
    >> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.

    >
    > Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
    > brain dead ganja cretin.


    I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
    with a blunt hanging from his lips.

    AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
    SOAC: "For what?"
    AS: "Registration to Usenet"
    SOAC: "Take cash?"
    AS: <grin> "Only".
    SOAC: "What do I get?"
    AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
    hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
    SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
    AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
    SOAC: "WTF?"
    AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
    SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>
    --
    Passwords, people, they are not just for game shows. If you refuse to
    make the effort to remember a few long, diverse passwords, then don't
    scream at me when your FICO is 496 and your bank accounts are zeroed
    out.

  2. #22
    RMCG
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:

    > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:
    >
    >> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
    >>>>
    >>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
    >>>
    >>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.

    >>
    >> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
    >>
    >> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
    >>
    >>> I grow for other people, not myself..

    >>
    >> Very kind.
    >>
    >>> yeah I smoke the weed...

    >>
    >> Very noticeable.
    >>
    >>> so ****ing
    >>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.

    >>
    >> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
    >> brain dead ganja cretin.

    >
    > I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
    > with a blunt hanging from his lips.
    >
    > AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
    > SOAC: "For what?"
    > AS: "Registration to Usenet"
    > SOAC: "Take cash?"
    > AS: <grin> "Only".
    > SOAC: "What do I get?"
    > AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
    > hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
    > SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
    > AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
    > SOAC: "WTF?"
    > AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
    > SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>


    You are an idiot as I don't grow weed illegally. I am 100% legal in my
    state.

  3. #23
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:26:46 -0400, RMCG wrote:

    > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:
    >>
    >>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
    >>>>
    >>>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.
    >>>
    >>> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
    >>>
    >>> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
    >>>
    >>>> I grow for other people, not myself..
    >>>
    >>> Very kind.
    >>>
    >>>> yeah I smoke the weed...
    >>>
    >>> Very noticeable.
    >>>
    >>>> so ****ing
    >>>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.
    >>>
    >>> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
    >>> brain dead ganja cretin.

    >>
    >> I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
    >> with a blunt hanging from his lips.
    >>
    >> AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
    >> SOAC: "For what?"
    >> AS: "Registration to Usenet"
    >> SOAC: "Take cash?"
    >> AS: <grin> "Only".
    >> SOAC: "What do I get?"
    >> AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
    >> hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
    >> SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
    >> AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
    >> SOAC: "WTF?"
    >> AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
    >> SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>

    >
    > You are an idiot as I don't grow weed illegally. I am 100% legal in my
    > state.


    No one said you were illegal. Paranoid a bit much, Assclown?

    Of course, you can tell that to the Federal Prosecutor after the DEA
    comes slashing through your front door, horribly mangling your tits,
    and wreaking havoc on your life as you play Bendover Bobby to the
    Leavenworth bitches squealing "I'm legal, I'm legal"!

    *LOL*

    Tell 'em you are Sam Caldwell's protégé. Yeah, that'll work. /lol/
    --
    http://www.dwacon.com/images/melgibson.jpg

  4. #24
    RMCG
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:34:51 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:

    > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:26:46 -0400, RMCG wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.
    >>>>
    >>>> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
    >>>>
    >>>> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
    >>>>
    >>>>> I grow for other people, not myself..
    >>>>
    >>>> Very kind.
    >>>>
    >>>>> yeah I smoke the weed...
    >>>>
    >>>> Very noticeable.
    >>>>
    >>>>> so ****ing
    >>>>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.
    >>>>
    >>>> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
    >>>> brain dead ganja cretin.
    >>>
    >>> I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
    >>> with a blunt hanging from his lips.
    >>>
    >>> AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
    >>> SOAC: "For what?"
    >>> AS: "Registration to Usenet"
    >>> SOAC: "Take cash?"
    >>> AS: <grin> "Only".
    >>> SOAC: "What do I get?"
    >>> AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
    >>> hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
    >>> SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
    >>> AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
    >>> SOAC: "WTF?"
    >>> AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
    >>> SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>

    >>
    >> You are an idiot as I don't grow weed illegally. I am 100% legal in my
    >> state.

    >
    > No one said you were illegal. Paranoid a bit much, Assclown?
    >
    > Of course, you can tell that to the Federal Prosecutor after the DEA
    > comes slashing through your front door, horribly mangling your tits,
    > and wreaking havoc on your life as you play Bendover Bobby to the
    > Leavenworth bitches squealing "I'm legal, I'm legal"!
    >
    > *LOL*
    >
    > Tell 'em you are Sam Caldwell's protégé. Yeah, that'll work. /lol/


    The Feds leave us alone, shithead, you don't know what you are farting
    on about. Who's Caldwell?

  5. #25
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:03:13 -0400, RMCG wrote:

    > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:34:51 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:26:46 -0400, RMCG wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0400, Ari Silverstein wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:56:15 +0000 (UTC), Mr.B1ack wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Huh? Is this a ninja-based charity?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> *HAHAHAHAHAHA*
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> I grow for other people, not myself..
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Very kind.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> yeah I smoke the weed...
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Very noticeable.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> so ****ing
    >>>>>> what? I'm wondering why I bothered to register for this ****hole.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Register? WTF are you talking about, register? This is Usenet you
    >>>>> brain dead ganja cretin.
    >>>>
    >>>> I took his money. I admit it. In come this stoked out assclown (SOAC)
    >>>> with a blunt hanging from his lips.
    >>>>
    >>>> AS: "That will be two hundred dollars"
    >>>> SOAC: "For what?"
    >>>> AS: "Registration to Usenet"
    >>>> SOAC: "Take cash?"
    >>>> AS: <grin> "Only".
    >>>> SOAC: "What do I get?"
    >>>> AS: "The right to be pummeled for being a Stoked Out AssClown who
    >>>> hasn't a clue about anonymity and privacy."
    >>>> SOAC: "Kewl." <rips cash out>
    >>>> AS: "And a pound of Blue Dream bud."
    >>>> SOAC: "WTF?"
    >>>> AS: "You want a thorough pounding or not?"
    >>>> SOAC: "Kewl." <tosses a kilo on the table>
    >>>
    >>> You are an idiot as I don't grow weed illegally. I am 100% legal in my
    >>> state.

    >>
    >> No one said you were illegal. Paranoid a bit much, Assclown?
    >>
    >> Of course, you can tell that to the Federal Prosecutor after the DEA
    >> comes slashing through your front door, horribly mangling your tits,
    >> and wreaking havoc on your life as you play Bendover Bobby to the
    >> Leavenworth bitches squealing "I'm legal, I'm legal"!
    >>
    >> *LOL*
    >>
    >> Tell 'em you are Sam Caldwell's protégé. Yeah, that'll work. /lol/

    >
    > The Feds leave us alone, shithead, you don't know what you are farting
    > on about.


    http://www.justice.gov/dea/pubs/pressrel/pr961106.htm

    > Who's Caldwell?


    It's over for you. You know that. Your entire life has been a waste.
    Lay down and die.
    --
    http://www.vitals.com/doctors/Dr_Ari_Silverstein.html

  6. #26
    w
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:53:14 -0400, RMCG wrote:

    > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:09:05 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:
    >
    >>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    >>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    >>> better.

    >>
    >>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--

    >>
    >>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html

    >>
    >> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)

    >
    > Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian. I grow for other people, not
    > myself yeah I smoke the weed so ****ing what? I'm wondering why I
    > bothered to register for this ****hole.


    Looks like you got your fukken ass banned you stupid fukker.

    *RMCG = /Guest/*

    *BWAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*

    https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread....79#post3807079

    Trolls Are Attracted To Idiots; Idiots Respond to Trolls

  7. #27
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:14:02 -0400, w wrote:

    > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:53:14 -0400, RMCG wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:09:05 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:
    >>
    >>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    >>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    >>>> better.
    >>>
    >>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
    >>>
    >>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
    >>>
    >>> And they sat that pot doesn't fry the brain. :-)

    >>
    >> Look ****up, I'm a social Samaraitarian. I grow for other people, not
    >> myself yeah I smoke the weed so ****ing what? I'm wondering why I
    >> bothered to register for this ****hole.

    >
    > Looks like you got your fukken ass banned you stupid fukker.
    >
    > *RMCG = /Guest/*
    >
    > *BWAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*
    >
    > https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread....79#post3807079
    >
    > Trolls Are Attracted To Idiots; Idiots Respond to Trolls


    wilburn, that's a darn shame. What a nice guy.

    For an AssClown.

    That he is.
    --
    Talk about F-Cars - www.ferrarichat.com/forum/member.php?u=89702

  8. #28
    effie
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein@yahoo.com> wrote in
    news:8dh7icF6ceU1@mid.individual.net:

    > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 02:21:46 -0400, RMCG wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 02:18:46 -0400, Overgrow wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:03:49 +0000 (UTC), za kAT wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 02:01:11 -0400, RMCG wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz
    >>>>> and I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies
    >>>>> that is better.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
    >>>>
    >>>> Certainly youu jest. A proxy chain is better than Tor?
    >>>>
    >>>>> http://www.thcfarmer.com/forums/gall...-protype1.html
    >>>>
    >>>> Stoner. Figgers.
    >>>
    >>> Here's the thread the Stoner is trying to hide.
    >>>
    >>> https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=184479&page=7
    >>>
    >>> wilbur(n) aka nemo outis aka Peter Fairbrother is kicking his ass.
    >>> rotflmao and sucking this idiot in further and further.

    >>
    >> ********. Answer my questions.

    >
    > My dear friend...
    >
    > Your questions are not worth the effort to answer. Here is why.
    >
    > 1) You have no clue wtf you are talking about.
    > 2) No one will back an assclown who is rightfully getting his
    > ass(clown) ass torn off.
    > 3) See 1)
    > 4) See 2)
    >
    > Tor, a DARPA funded, US Naval intelligence project that was picked up
    > and refined over many years by top line cryptologists and this
    > bucketload...
    >

    Tor a ****ed up system that does not work half the time. Drops
    connections, not anonymous-nodes ****ing with ur data streams, cannot
    do simple DNS lookups, cannot even handle simple chat.

    We need something better; it's not gonna come from the Tor Developers,
    they've had enough time and no results.


  9. #29
    Joseph Ashwood
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
    > I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    > called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    > I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    > better.
    >
    > He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    > about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--



    Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.

    With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
    simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
    From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.

    With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
    systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
    exceptionally more difficult.

    This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
    Joe


  10. #30
    RMCG
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:

    > "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
    >> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    >> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    >> better.
    >>
    >> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--

    >
    > Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
    >
    > With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
    > simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
    > From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
    >
    > With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
    > systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
    > exceptionally more difficult.
    >
    > This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
    > Joe


    I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
    way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
    used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
    been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
    have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
    networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
    fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant

    These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)

    You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
    around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
    proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
    pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
    get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
    been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
    on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.

  11. #31
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:21:03 -0400, RMCG wrote:

    > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
    >
    >> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
    >>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    >>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    >>> better.
    >>>
    >>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--

    >>
    >> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
    >>
    >> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
    >> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
    >> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
    >>
    >> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
    >> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
    >> exceptionally more difficult.
    >>
    >> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
    >> Joe

    >
    > I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
    > way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
    > used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
    > been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
    > have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
    > networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
    > fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
    >
    > These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)
    >
    > You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
    > around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
    > proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
    > pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
    > get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
    > been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
    > on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.


    They don't log?

    lol

    P-P just got their admins busted in Germany. When you go connecting to
    servers all over creation, expect to run into some rather irrational
    LEOs and damning judicial systems..

    Btw, OpenVPN only supports 2Kbit PKE anf P-P claims they use 4K PKE
    with OpenVPN.

    Translation: They lie.

    Tor.

    Get over it.
    --
    Passwords, people, they are not just for game shows. If you refuse to
    make the effort to remember a few long, diverse passwords, then don't
    scream at me when your FICO is 496 and your bank accounts are zeroed
    out.

  12. #32
    Buck Mulligan
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On 8/29/2010 3:53 PM, Ari Silverstein wrote:
    > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:21:03 -0400, RMCG wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
    >>
    >>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
    >>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    >>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    >>>> better.
    >>>>
    >>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
    >>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
    >>>
    >>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
    >>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
    >>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
    >>>
    >>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
    >>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
    >>> exceptionally more difficult.
    >>>
    >>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
    >>> Joe

    >> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
    >> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
    >> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
    >> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
    >> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
    >> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
    >> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
    >>
    >> These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)
    >>
    >> You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
    >> around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
    >> proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
    >> pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
    >> get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
    >> been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
    >> on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.

    > They don't log?
    >
    > lol
    >
    > P-P just got their admins busted in Germany. When you go connecting to
    > servers all over creation, expect to run into some rather irrational
    > LEOs and damning judicial systems..
    >
    > Btw, OpenVPN only supports 2Kbit PKE anf P-P claims they use 4K PKE
    > with OpenVPN.
    >
    > Translation: They lie.
    >
    > Tor.
    >
    > Get over it.


    Talking to yourself again, Frank? (a.k.a. Frank J. Camper, King of the
    Sockpuppets)

    No one else will talk to him, so he has to talk to himself using made up
    characters with made up names.

    Pitiful. Pathetic.





  13. #33
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    In article <4c7ab336@news.x-privat.org>
    RMCG <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >


    >
    > I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
    > way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
    > used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
    > been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
    > have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
    > networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
    > fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
    >
    > These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)
    >
    > You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
    > around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
    > proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
    > pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
    > get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
    > been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
    > on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.


    It always boils down to the "no logging" thing.
    Perfect-Privacy has the usual Terms and Conditions as found on
    http://perfect-privacy.com/terms.html. If there truly is no logging, by
    what means would Perfect-Privacy enforce their terms?












  14. #34
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:46:48 +0000, Anonymous wrote:

    > In article <4c7ab336@news.x-privat.org>
    > RMCG <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>

    >
    >>
    >> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
    >> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
    >> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
    >> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
    >> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
    >> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
    >> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
    >>
    >> These guys are the Nuts!! (if you play poker you know what I mean)
    >>
    >> You can do an openvpn connection to one of their several servers
    >> around the world, then add a ssh tunnel to another servers squid
    >> proxy, and chain that to another servers socks 5 proxy. It can get
    >> pretty slow the more you chain it, but it's about as secure as you can
    >> get. Also, all their servers (according to them at least and I have
    >> been given no reason to doubt them) have highly encrypted hard drives
    >> on hardened Linux Servers and do not use any logging features at all.

    >
    > It always boils down to the "no logging" thing.
    > Perfect-Privacy has the usual Terms and Conditions as found on
    > http://perfect-privacy.com/terms.html. If there truly is no logging, by
    > what means would Perfect-Privacy enforce their terms?


    They can't but as a VPN they don't have too keep logs by law (USA). To
    keep their systems running, they just remember everything.

    *LOL*

    Our friend Rocky Mountain Illegal Marijuana Grower has a couple of
    problems. One, he's has a little knowledge that has exploded into his
    version of genius and 2) he'll get his ass busted soon enough anyway
    so what difference will it make?
    --
    http://www.vitals.com/doctors/Dr_Ari_Silverstein.html

  15. #35
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:38:24 -0400, Buck Mulligan wrote:

    > Talking to yourself again, Frank? (a.k.a. Frank J. Camper, King of the
    > Sockpuppets)


    Frank, yeah, you got me there Lal Singh.

    lol
    --
    Ari's Fun Times!
    http://tr.im/hrFG
    Motto: Run, rabbit, Run!

  16. #36
    RMCG
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:24:23 +0200 (CEST), Dave U. Random wrote:

    > RMCG wrote:
    >> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
    >>
    >>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
    >>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    >>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    >>>> better.
    >>>>
    >>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
    >>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
    >>>
    >>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
    >>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
    >>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
    >>>
    >>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
    >>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
    >>> exceptionally more difficult.
    >>>
    >>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
    >>> Joe

    >>
    >> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
    >> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
    >> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
    >> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
    >> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
    >> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
    >> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
    >>

    >
    > Good luck with your traffic over there at, ahem, "Perfect Privacy"
    >
    > https://blog.perfect-privacy.com/201...-house-search/


    All you *******s can go **** yourselves. These are the so called
    experts, you guys don't know **** a bunch of Google users who claim
    expertise. Total ********. Pathetic. Pitiful.

    Unless you have EVIDENCE that P-P is bad, go **** yourself and STFUp

  17. #37
    Buck Mulligan
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On 8/30/2010 5:56 PM, RMCG wrote:
    > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:24:23 +0200 (CEST), Dave U. Random wrote:
    >
    >> RMCG wrote:
    >>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
    >>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    >>>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    >>>>> better.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
    >>>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
    >>>>
    >>>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
    >>>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
    >>>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
    >>>>
    >>>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
    >>>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
    >>>> exceptionally more difficult.
    >>>>
    >>>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
    >>>> Joe
    >>> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
    >>> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
    >>> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
    >>> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
    >>> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
    >>> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
    >>> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
    >>>

    >> Good luck with your traffic over there at, ahem, "Perfect Privacy"
    >>
    >> https://blog.perfect-privacy.com/201...-house-search/

    > All you *******s can go **** yourselves. These are the so called
    > experts, you guys don't know **** a bunch of Google users who claim
    > expertise. Total ********. Pathetic. Pitiful.
    >
    > Unless you have EVIDENCE that P-P is bad, go **** yourself and STFUp


    The unmistakable fingerprint of Frank J. Camper (a.k.a. Ari Silverstein,
    The King of the Sockpuppets)

    If by chance somebody does condescends, and respond to him, but doesn't
    reply with what he wants so desperately to read, he always retreats and
    starts using profanity, thinking this will make him look like a MAN!!

    So pitiful, and so pathetic.

    Calm down, Frank. You look like a fool.





  18. #38
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:56:33 -0400, RMCG wrote:

    > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:24:23 +0200 (CEST), Dave U. Random wrote:
    >
    >> RMCG wrote:
    >>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:08:37 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> "RMCG" <rmcg@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4c736026@news.x-privat.org...
    >>>>> I grow weed illegally and am an IT specialist who has this *******
    >>>>> called wilbur calling me out for ********. He says Tor is the nazz and
    >>>>> I KNOW Tor sucks and I can configure a daisy chain of proxies that is
    >>>>> better.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> He sent me to these newsgroups to talk to "professionals" rotflmao
    >>>>> about that but I'll give you a day in my court.--
    >>>> Since you have a real opinion, I'll give you a real answer.
    >>>>
    >>>> With a fixed path such as a daisy chain of proxies, it is a relatively
    >>>> simple matter to break each one in turn, tracing everything back to you.
    >>>> From a law enforcement standpoint, its useless.
    >>>>
    >>>> With Tor, because the path itself is random it is necesssary to break all
    >>>> systems in the entire network. Since there are many more users of Tor it is
    >>>> exceptionally more difficult.
    >>>>
    >>>> This is the foundation of onion routing and why you are completely wrong.
    >>>> Joe
    >>>
    >>> I've done quite a bit of research over the years looking for the best
    >>> way to keep my internet traffic secure and anonymous. I've tried and
    >>> used many services, everything from proxies to ssh tunnels and I've
    >>> been using an OpenVPN service from Perfect-Privacy for a while now and
    >>> have been extremely pleased with it so far. FYI, I used to work in the
    >>> networking field in the past (altho it changes and advances so damn
    >>> fast) so this isn't a clueless newbs rant
    >>>

    >>
    >> Good luck with your traffic over there at, ahem, "Perfect Privacy"
    >>
    >> https://blog.perfect-privacy.com/201...-house-search/

    >
    > All you *******s can go **** yourselves. These are the so called
    > experts, you guys don't know **** a bunch of Google users who claim
    > expertise. Total ********. Pathetic. Pitiful.
    >
    > Unless you have EVIDENCE that P-P is bad, go **** yourself and STFUp


    You need to get your lies in order. First you claim to be "daisy
    chaining" proxies now you're a firmly entrenched Piss-Poor-Privacy
    evangelist.

    I know chameleons that change less often. lol

    Piss-Poor-Privacy is a PITA. Been there, done that, ain't going back.
    Every reboot or dropped connect has to be login ID, password and
    reselected a server. Since you are hopping around all over the damn
    world, try that out on Google Gmail and dozens of other sites which
    spam filter or blacklist logins from multiple IPs. Dropped connection
    means Internet shutoff, nopers, Got to get that elsewhere
    (VPNCheck,outgoing firewall, etc)

    I can't remember the speed except from the USA based servers it
    sucked. Big time. Hell, might as well use Tor...for free...and much
    more private.

    But you know that since you had to change your stance to keep from
    getting continually clobbered for your lousy "daisy chaining"
    protocol.

    lol

    Assclown.

    That you are.
    --
    Talk about F-Cars - www.ferrarichat.com/forum/member.php?u=89702

  19. #39
    Ari Silverstein
    Guest

    Re: Tor v.s. My Proxy Daisy Chain

    On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:14:16 -0400, Buck Mulligan wrote:

    >>> https://blog.perfect-privacy.com/201...-house-search/
    >>> Total ********. Pathetic. Pitiful.


    >
    > So pitiful, and so pathetic.



    Speaking of "fingerprints"...*LOL*

    > Calm down, Frank. You look like a fool.


    Thanks, Ammand.
    --
    Ari's Fun Times!
    http://tr.im/hrFG
    Motto: Run, rabbit, Run!

Similar Threads

  1. Proxy Top is a free proxy
    By bensino adoul in forum alt.internet.wireless
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-24-09, 07:10 AM
  2. IRC with proxy
    By Jackson75 in forum Network Security
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-04-09, 07:22 AM
  3. Proxy Servers
    By QuazzieM in forum Networking Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-08, 01:03 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-25-07, 06:17 AM
  5. Forcing a Program to use a proxy
    By PhilBon in forum Wireless Networks & Routers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-27-07, 10:18 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •