Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 38 of 38

Thread: A SMART Tamper Indicator

  1. #21
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    Swat!

  2. #22
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    Swat!

  3. #23
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:31:59 GMT
    "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote:

    > Swat!


    That, sir was an argument worthy of consideration, and I have to admit, you
    completely won me over to your side of the debate with it.

    Or not.

    Seriously though, enjoy your little tamper-indication measure, and we all thank
    you for informing and enlightening those of us (not me) who may think it might
    be useful. Calling people fools won't accomplish anything, it will only make
    you look like a troll.

    --
    n.

  4. #24
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    <someone@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:20100725015926.753d2142@gmail.com:

    > On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:31:59 GMT
    > "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote:
    >
    >> Swat!

    >
    > That, sir was an argument worthy of consideration, and I
    > have to admit, you completely won me over to your side of
    > the debate with it.
    >
    > Or not.
    >
    > Seriously though, enjoy your little tamper-indication
    > measure, and we all thank you for informing and
    > enlightening those of us (not me) who may think it might
    > be useful. Calling people fools won't accomplish anything,
    > it will only make you look like a troll.



    As you may have already gathered, I do not suffer fools
    gladly.

    Nor do I use pleasant euphemisms to sugarcoat reality - I call
    fools what they are: fools. When they simply repeat their
    arrant nonsense I dismiss them summarily with a Swat!

    I am a nasty prick. But I am not a stupid nasty prick. To
    the contrary, I am a very clever, very knowledgeable nasty
    prick.

    You do not have to like me to learn from me. (1)

    Regards,

    (1) Or you can choose not to. Either way I don't give a ****.





  5. #25
    za kAT
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:28:10 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:

    > As you may have already gathered, I do not suffer fools
    > gladly.


    Then why is it your idea of a meal is macaroni while your wife is
    flitting about Nepal with god knows who?
    --
    zakAT@pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416.
    Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!

  6. #26
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    Swat!

  7. #27
    FromTheRafters
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    "iggster" <fryphil@nomailatall.com> wrote in message
    news:bv8qh7-gpn.ln1@web1.xssnet.com...

    [...]

    > No need to reply. I am fine with you having the last word.


    :oD




  8. #28
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    Swat!

  9. #29
    FromTheRafters
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
    news:Xns9DC04DF379EBFpqwertyu@69.16.185.247...
    > Swat!


    Why? You didn't see that statement as being absurd? It should have been "Go
    ahead and reply...."



  10. #30
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
    news:i2q5og$tp0$1@news.eternal-september.org:

    > "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
    > news:Xns9DC04DF379EBFpqwertyu@69.16.185.247...
    >> Swat!

    >
    > Why? You didn't see that statement as being absurd? It
    > should have been "Go ahead and reply...."



    Absurd? How much effort do you think I should expend on
    *******s, trolls, and triflers?

    I debated with myself whether even a one word dismissal gave
    them more prominence than they deserved.

    Regards,

  11. #31
    za kAT
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:09:23 GMT, nemo_outis wrote:

    > "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
    > news:i2q5og$tp0$1@news.eternal-september.org:
    >
    >> "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
    >> news:Xns9DC04DF379EBFpqwertyu@69.16.185.247...
    >>> Swat!

    >>
    >> Why? You didn't see that statement as being absurd? It
    >> should have been "Go ahead and reply...."

    >
    > Absurd? Of course I am! How much effort do you think I should expend
    > on *******s, trolls, and triflers much like myself?


    None? I dunno, some?
    --
    zakAT@pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416.
    Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!

  12. #32
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    Swat!

  13. #33
    FromTheRafters
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
    news:Xns9DC3A4593548Fpqwertyu@69.16.185.250...
    > "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
    > news:i2q5og$tp0$1@news.eternal-september.org:
    >
    >> "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote in message
    >> news:Xns9DC04DF379EBFpqwertyu@69.16.185.247...
    >>> Swat!

    >>
    >> Why? You didn't see that statement as being absurd? It
    >> should have been "Go ahead and reply...."

    >
    >
    > Absurd? How much effort do you think I should expend on
    > *******s, trolls, and triflers?


    That's entirely up to you.

    > I debated with myself whether even a one word dismissal gave
    > them more prominence than they deserved.


    Them, sure - whatever. You swatted *me* for no good reason. That troll made
    himself look foolish with that statement, I pointed it out only to be
    swatted by some even more foolish ass.



  14. #34
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 08:34:50 -0400
    "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    > Them, sure - whatever. You swatted *me* for no good reason. That troll made
    > himself look foolish with that statement, I pointed it out only to be
    > swatted by some even more foolish ass.


    I expect another *SWAT* coming, because you have a different opinion than the
    resident swatter here. :)

  15. #35
    FromTheRafters
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    <someone@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:20100801152308.250548f6@gmail.com...
    > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 08:34:50 -0400
    > "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    >
    >> Them, sure - whatever. You swatted *me* for no good reason. That troll
    >> made
    >> himself look foolish with that statement, I pointed it out only to be
    >> swatted by some even more foolish ass.

    >
    > I expect another *SWAT* coming, because you have a different opinion than
    > the
    > resident swatter here. :)


    ....should I wait for it?




  16. #36
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    Unswat!

  17. #37
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    Swat!

  18. #38
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: A SMART Tamper Indicator

    Swat!

Similar Threads

  1. Vista Smart Security virus
    By darfun in forum comp.security.firewalls
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-23-10, 02:30 AM
  2. Eset Smart security suite
    By 24giovanni in forum Software Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-07-08, 04:10 PM
  3. Smart Alec answers
    By cybotron r_9 in forum General Discussion Board
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-16-08, 08:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •