Page 1 of 19 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 375

Thread: More EarthQuakes

  1. #1
    Ohh Hell yeah.. Sava700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    24,051

    More EarthQuakes

    List the Quakes you hear about here...

    Another one today - Magnitude 5.8 - OFFSHORE GUATEMALA

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...us2010rqb3.php

    They are really happening alot more here lately which makes you wonder if 2012 is really right around the corner to coming true!!

  2. #2
    SG Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,943
    It does make you wonder for sure.

  3. #3
    Advanced Member Xpunge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    615
    Hugo Chavezs' buddy, Danny Glover, says global warming is the cause.


    where's the koo koo smilie?
    09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0

    "Appeasers feed the crocodile, hoping it will eat them last." - Winston Churchill

    "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi

  4. #4
    Freedom Fighter jeremyboycool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,042
    2012... (People will believe anything.)

    From the same web page Sava posted.


    Q: Why are we having so many earthquakes? Has earthquake activity been increasing? Does this mean a big one is going to hit? OR We haven't had any earthquakes in a long time; does this mean that the pressure is building up?

    A: Although it may seem that we are having more earthquakes, earthquakes of magnitude 7.0 or greater have remained fairly constant throughout this century and, according to our records, have actually seemed to decrease in recent years.

    There are several reasons for the perception that the number of earthquakes, in general, and particularly destructive earthquakes is increasing.

    1) A partial explanation may lie in the fact that in the last twenty years, we have definitely had an increase in the number of earthquakes we have been able to locate each year. This is because of the tremendous increase in the number of seismograph stations in the world and the many improvements in global communications.

    In 1931, there were about 350 stations operating in the world; today, there are more that 4,000 stations and the data now comes in rapidly from these stations by telex, computer and satellite. This increase in the number of stations and the more timely receipt of data has allowed us and other seismological centers to locate many small earthquakes which were undetected in earlier years, and we are able to locate earthquakes more rapidly.

    The NEIC now locates about 12,000 to 14,000 earthquakes each year or approximately 50 per day. Also, because of the improvements in communications and the increased interest in natural disasters, the public now learns about more earthquakes. According to long-term records (since about 1900), we expect about 18 major earthquakes (7.0 - 7.9) and one great earthquake (8.0 or above) in any given year. However, let's take a look at what has happened in the past 32 years, from 1969 through 2001, so far. Our records show that 1992, and 1995-1997 were the only years that we have reached or exceeded the long-term average number of major earthquakes since 1971. In 1970 and in 1971 we had 20 and 19 major earthquakes, respectively, but in other years the total was in many cases well below the 18 per year which we may expect based on the long-term average.

    2) The population at risk is increasing. While the number of large earthquakes is fairly constant, population density in earthquake-prone areas is constantly increasing. In some countries, the new construction that comes with population growth has better earthquake resistance; but in many it does not. So we are now seeing increasing casualties from the same sized earthquakes.

    3) Better global communication. Just a few decades ago, if several hundred people were killed by an earthquake in Indonesia or eastern China, for example, the media in the rest of the world would not know about it until several days, to weeks, later, long after such an event would be deemed “newsworthy”. So by the time this information was available, it would probably be relegated to the back pages of the newspaper, if at all. And the public Internet didn't even exist. We are now getting this information almost immediately.

    4) Earthquake clustering and human psychology. While the average number of large earthquakes per year is fairly constant, earthquakes occur in clusters. This is predicted by various statistical models, and does not imply that earthquakes that are distant in location, but close in time, are causally related. But when such clusters occur, especially when they are widely reported in the media, they are noticed. However, during the equally anomalous periods during which no destructive earthquakes occur, no one deems this as remarkable.

    A temporal increase in earthquake activity does not mean that a large earthquake is about to happen. Similarly, quiescence, or the lack of seismicity, does not mean a large earthquake is going to happen. A temporary increase or decrease in the seismicity rate is usually just part of the natural variation in the seismicity. There is no way for us to know whether or not this time it will lead to a larger earthquake. Swarms of small events, especially in geothermal areas, are common, and moderate-large magnitude earthquakes will typically have an aftershock sequence that follows. All that is normal and expected earthquake activity.
    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/faq...ID=6&faqID=110
    "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." - Stephen Hawking

  5. #5
    Revenant 9mmprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    out where the lions roar
    Posts
    1,756
    I dont believe in the 2012 nonsense, but in the last couple weeks there have been a lot of earthquakes. I believe the above article was written more generally, for the last few years, no? In the last two/two and a half weeks we've had like six or seven good sized earthquakes. I cant help thinking somethings up.
    There is security in fearlessness.

  6. #6
    NYC Newbie Slayer Prey521's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Humble, Tx
    Posts
    34,934
    Another quake today...5.8 in the Cayman Islands.
    Have your feelings been hurt by a random act of E-Thuggery? If so, call 1-800-Waaaaahmbulance, we're here 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week, to take your call, you could be due a large monetary settlement, don't delay, call now.

    "Please be careful prior to entering the world wide web, the internet is serious business"


  7. #7
    Freedom Fighter jeremyboycool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,042
    Quote Originally Posted by 9mmprincess View Post
    I dont believe in the 2012 nonsense, but in the last couple weeks there have been a lot of earthquakes. I believe the above article was written more generally, for the last few years, no? In the last two/two and a half weeks we've had like six or seven good sized earthquakes. I cant help thinking somethings up.
    "A temporal increase in earthquake activity does not mean that a large earthquake is about to happen. Similarly, quiescence, or the lack of seismicity, does not mean a large earthquake is going to happen. A temporary increase or decrease in the seismicity rate is usually just part of the natural variation in the seismicity. There is no way for us to know whether or not this time it will lead to a larger earthquake. Swarms of small events, especially in geothermal areas, are common, and moderate-large magnitude earthquakes will typically have an aftershock sequence that follows. All that is normal and expected earthquake activity. " - From the article.
    Last edited by jeremyboycool; 01-19-10 at 12:49 PM.
    "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." - Stephen Hawking

  8. #8
    Peace Debbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New Rochelle, New York
    Posts
    18,126
    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...uakes_all.html

    Interesting site. Although, I would assume the repeat events are just aftershocks.

  9. #9
    Ohh Hell yeah.. Sava700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    24,051
    Quote Originally Posted by JBrazen View Post
    Another quake today...5.8 in the Cayman Islands.

  10. #10
    R.I.P. MissTynker2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    6,930
    Haiti hit again! To me that is no aftershock...that's a brand new quake!

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lapl...eir-sleep.html
    Mystical Folding Minx

  11. #11
    Ohh Hell yeah.. Sava700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    24,051
    Quote Originally Posted by MissTynker2 View Post
    Haiti hit again! To me that is no aftershock...that's a brand new quake!

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lapl...eir-sleep.html
    See!! Its starting... prepare now! 2012 is right around the corner!!

  12. #12
    Revenant 9mmprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    out where the lions roar
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by jeremyboycool View Post
    "A temporal increase in earthquake activity does not mean that a large earthquake is about to happen. Similarly, quiescence, or the lack of seismicity, does not mean a large earthquake is going to happen. A temporary increase or decrease in the seismicity rate is usually just part of the natural variation in the seismicity. There is no way for us to know whether or not this time it will lead to a larger earthquake. Swarms of small events, especially in geothermal areas, are common, and moderate-large magnitude earthquakes will typically have an aftershock sequence that follows. All that is normal and expected earthquake activity. " - From the article.
    I read the article, there was no need to quote it to me.
    There is security in fearlessness.

  13. #13
    Ohh Hell yeah.. Sava700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    24,051
    Rare Earthquake Shakes Northern Ill.

    See!!! Its happening more regular now and in more places.... 2012 people... its coming!!

    A small pre-dawn earthquake has hit northern Illinois, startling sleepy-eyed residents as far away as Iowa and Indiana, but no damage or injuries were immediately reported.

    The U.S. Geological Survey says the 3.8-magnitude earthquake hit about 50 miles northwest of Chicago at 4 a.m. Wednesday. The USGS initially reported the magnitude as 4.3 but later downgraded it.

    USGS geophysicist Amy Vaughan says such quakes are rare in northern Illinois.
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/...html?tag=stack

  14. #14
    Second Most EVIL YARDofSTUF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    70,010
    OMG everyone panic!

    Oh wait nm, its just Sava.

    Just cause its rare for the area doesn't mean we're getting more.

    As for there being more in general recently, reread what Jeremy posted.

  15. #15
    Ohh Hell yeah.. Sava700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    24,051
    Quote Originally Posted by YARDofSTUF View Post
    OMG everyone panic!

    Oh wait nm, its just Sava.

    Just cause its rare for the area doesn't mean we're getting more.

    As for there being more in general recently, reread what Jeremy posted.
    I think its safe to assume there are more than usual according to reports coming out not to mention the locations and intensity of each one. Sure I might be just exaggerating it for some fun but ya never know and its something to think about!

  16. #16
    Second Most EVIL YARDofSTUF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    70,010
    Quote Originally Posted by Sava700 View Post
    I think its safe to assume there are more than usual according to reports coming out...
    You mean like the report Jeremy posted saying there aren't more than usual?

  17. #17
    Ohh Hell yeah.. Sava700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    24,051
    Quote Originally Posted by YARDofSTUF View Post
    You mean like the report Jeremy posted saying there aren't more than usual?
    There are people that write articles against it and people that write articles for it... You have some scientists that say global warming is happening and some that say it's not.

  18. #18
    Second Most EVIL YARDofSTUF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    70,010
    Quote Originally Posted by Sava700 View Post
    There are people that write articles against it and people that write articles for it... You have some scientists that say global warming is happening and some that say it's not.
    So where are these artlices about the earthquake numbers increasing and leading to a big event?

  19. #19
    Freedom Fighter jeremyboycool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,042
    Quote Originally Posted by Sava700 View Post
    There are people that write articles against it and people that write articles for it... You have some scientists that say global warming is happening and some that say it's not.
    I got that article from the same web site you posted in the OP.
    "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." - Stephen Hawking

  20. #20
    Resident Atheist Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Orangevale ,Ca
    Posts
    18,682
    at least here,there are and always have and will in the future continue to have sometimes hundreds of earthquakes daily,that's normal

    http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/latest.htm

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/
    Last edited by Dan; 02-10-10 at 11:47 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •