Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 53 of 53

Thread: DriveCrypt

  1. #41
    Dave U. Random
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    nemo_outis wrote:

    > Ari <DROPTheJooseIsLoose@gmail.comCAPITALLETTERS> wrote in
    > news:ggorap$nqi$1@news.motzarella.org:
    >
    > > "You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself"
    > > Ken Thompson "Reflections on Trusting Trust"

    >
    > I don't even trust code that I wrote :-)


    Join the club.




  2. #42
    Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    nemo_outis wrote:

    > Nightmix-Remailer <spam_for_blackhole@nurfuerspam.de> wrote in
    > news:4EIR8FIP39783.0986226852@blackhole.org:
    >
    > It's nice you have access to a computer down there at the home for the
    > feeble-minded.


    I notice you don't have the balls to refute the fact that you're a
    congenital liar regarding the openness of Truecrypt source code, and
    your idiot-savant is a congenital dimwit who actually thinks
    there's a crumb of credibility to anything you say. No, you had to
    snip and run from all that and make one of your failed attempts to
    be cute, as cover. Didn't you kiddo.

    That makes you an exposed coward, and me the Tidy Bowl Man.

    That's right. Gotcha *again*, bitch. :-p

    Gonna crumble into your usual pile of quivering "blither" spew for
    us this time?


  3. #43
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    "Non scrivetemi" <nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote in
    news:ca202cfc2ae0773ce7bb7d626578d71c@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info:

    The whining mosquitoes are back. Swat!

  4. #44
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    Dave U. Random <anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote in
    news:4bbaa80ca7a3b0c2d357556193d11fb1@anonymitaet-im-inter.net:

    Swat!

  5. #45
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in
    news:999610dabdf12eba4e2166aa005ea5ad@remailer.cyberiade.it:

    Swat!

  6. #46
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
    news:9a40691ce18694ce96b6bf57783460be@dizum.com:

    >>> "You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself"
    >>> Ken Thompson "Reflections on Trusting Trust"


    >> Yes, the above paper - which everyone here should read! - makes a
    >> very powerful point.


    > If you're a moron.


    Dear, dear! What to do? What to do? Listen to K. Thompson - a giant of
    computing, the recipient of the Turing Award, the corecipient (with
    Ritchie) of the National Medal of Technology from President Clinton for co-
    inventing the UNIX operating system and the C programming language - in his
    paper published by the ACM, which is considered a classic of computer
    literature, or instead to the whinings of an anonymous troll?

    Back under your bridge, troll!


  7. #47
    Anonymous Remailer (austria)
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt


    nemo_outis wrote:

    > Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in
    > news:999610dabdf12eba4e2166aa005ea5ad@remailer.cyberiade.it:
    >
    > Swat!


    I notice you don't have the balls to refute the fact that you're a
    congenital liar regarding the openness of Truecrypt source code, and
    your idiot-savant is a congenital dimwit who actually thinks
    there's a crumb of credibility to anything you say. No, you had to
    snip and run from all that and make one of your failed attempts to
    be cute, as cover. Didn't you kiddo.

    That makes you an exposed coward, and me the Tidy Bowl Man.

    That's right. Gotcha *again*, bitch. :-p

    Gonna crumble into your usual pile of quivering "blither" spew for
    us this time?


  8. #48
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    Swat!

  9. #49
    Anonymous Remailer (austria)
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt


    Ari wrote:

    > On 1 Dec 2008 01:22:01 -0000, Nightmix-Remailer wrote:
    >
    > > nemo_outis wrote:
    > >
    > >> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
    > >> news:751124944d936a1f05a0ade1767aa5da@dizum.com:
    > >>
    > >>> Absolutely amazing. No wonder Usenet is such a toilet.
    > >>
    > >> Thanks for adding your incremental turd.

    > >
    > > I notice you don't have the balls to refute the fact that you're a
    > > congenital liar

    >
    > My God! nemo lied as a fetus! Nemo, you never told me! lol


    Nah, he's just genetically incapable of telling the truth when
    he's proved wrong about something because he mistakenly believes
    he's saving face. Not quite so afflicted as a poor soul like you,
    who's compelled to lie even when the truth sounds better, but the
    same general sort of ******* in any case.


  10. #50
    Anonymous Remailer
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt


    nemo_outis wrote:

    > Swat!


    I notice you don't have the balls to refute the fact that you're a
    congenital liar regarding the openness of Truecrypt source code, and
    your idiot-savant is a congenital dimwit who actually thinks
    there's a crumb of credibility to anything you say. No, you had to
    snip and run from all that and make one of your failed attempts to
    be cute, as cover. Didn't you kiddo.

    That makes you an exposed coward, and me the Tidy Bowl Man.

    That's right. Gotcha *again*, bitch. :-p

    Gonna crumble into your usual pile of quivering "blither" spew for
    us this time?


  11. #51
    Fred C Dobbs
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    In article <Xns9B6857461A26pqwertyu@69.16.185.247>
    "nemo_outis" <abc@xyz.com> wrote:
    >
    > Swat!


    Don't you mean "Twat!" ?

    Because that's what you are!




  12. #52
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    Swat!

  13. #53
    nemo_outis
    Guest

    Re: DriveCrypt

    Swat!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •