TCP Optimizer version 2.0.3 released

[zaxfire69]

Oh My...Thank you so much whoever made this program...I have been working with my cable company for a week to try to figure out why i was only getting 1.5 megs down when I was paying for 3.0 megs down...I kid you not...I found you guys forum..I saw this program. I downloaded it an ran it ran the optimum settings for my connection..And ahh be danged if as soon as I rebooted my computer got back online and did a speed test 3.1 megs down..Freekin awesome..Whoever invented this one if you were in my town..My friend me and you would be eating a big fat steak paid for by me..You saved me from making more of an idiot out of myself...THANK YOU>>>>

[Philip]

Oh My...Thank you so much whoever made this program...I have been working with my cable company for a week to try to figure out why i was only getting 1.5 megs down when I was paying for 3.0 megs down...I kid you not...I found you guys forum..I saw this program. I downloaded it an ran it ran the optimum settings for my connection..And ahh be danged if as soon as I rebooted my computer got back online and did a speed test 3.1 megs down..Freekin awesome..Whoever invented this one if you were in my town..My friend me and you would be eating a big fat steak paid for by me..You saved me from making more of an idiot out of myself...THANK YOU>>>>

Glad it worked that well for you, and thanks for sharing

This site has always been about helping broadband users, and actually being able to motivates us and keeps us going

[imawag]

Tried DRTCP, Cablenut, Tweakmaster, TweakDun plus other tweaks. This one works best. Found setting the MTU for PPPoE to 1452 - not the recommended 1492 - provides more stability (no dropouts) and more consistant speeds.

Thanks! Great work.

[xmOD]

the settings shown when choosing the optimal setup for my connection speed are less then wat my current values are.. so should is still apply them or should i retain the current ones as the internet may go slow after applying the settings?

[Love2lounge2]

I'm using the Sprint EVDO network for access and have the Pantech PX500 Rev A card but Rev A hasn’t been turned on in Buena Park (Los Angeles) CA but my upload and download times have been acceptable with signal strength between -71dBm to -83dBm but I think I can do better if my latency (ping) times were lower. I have downloaded and ran TCP Optimizer 2.0.3 which helped my speeds but latency times have always been consistently high and I'm looking for suggestions to lower those times. I'm using a 2005 Toshiba-XP(SP2)-1gb RAM and no spyware or viruses.

Here are my numbers:


Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7
Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.
TCP options string = 020405b40103030201010402
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.
Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 256960
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits (scale factor of 4)
Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240

RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) <-- current value
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
64240 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your TCP Window limits you to: 10278.4 kbps (1284.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your TCP Window limits you to: 4111.36 kbps (513.92 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 48 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0)

Pinging [193.10.252.19] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=311ms TTL=231
Pinging [193.10.252.19] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=327ms TTL=231
Pinging [193.10.252.19] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=288ms TTL=231
Pinging [193.10.252.19] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=302ms TTL=231
Pinging [193.10.252.19] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=321ms TTL=231
Pinging [218.32.192.112] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=45
Pinging [218.32.192.112] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=254ms TTL=45
Pinging [218.32.192.112] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=45
Pinging [218.32.192.112] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=266ms TTL=45
Pinging [218.32.192.112] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=294ms TTL=45
Pinging [204.127.166.135] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=40
Pinging [204.127.166.135] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=183ms TTL=40
Pinging [204.127.166.135] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=40
Pinging [204.127.135.135] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=43
Pinging [204.127.135.135] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=184ms TTL=43
Pinging [207.155.248.99] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=238
Pinging [207.155.248.99] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=238
Pinging [207.155.248.99] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=238
Pinging [207.155.248.99] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=238
Pinging [207.155.248.99] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=238
Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=45
Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=45
Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=45
Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=45
Pinging [63.217.30.70] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=45
Ping statistics for above hosts:
Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 25, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times (RTT) in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 119ms, Maximum = 327ms, Average = 221ms
Thanks ahead of time for the help.

[Philip]

Please start a separate thread if you're asking about help with current settings. This thread is intended for comments/bug reports/suggestions about the TCP Optimizer program. TIA

[Chaa006]

We've released an updated version of the TCP Optimizer 2, including some minor improvements and bug fixes as described in the documentation. This version 2.0.3 is now the latest stable release.

Feel free to post any comments, feedback, or bug reports about the release in this thread.

Excellent program, but one request : could the Largest MTU tool be tweaked to avoid using 1125 or any other odd-length packets, as a known bug involving Intel cards and Cisco routers causes such packets to time-out ?

[mk2supra]

i go to use the largest MTU option in the optimizer and it times out when sending 1456 bytes and fragments when sending 1476 - what does this mean?

[trogers]

i go to use the largest MTU option in the optimizer and it times out when sending 1456 bytes and fragments when sending 1476 - what does this mean?

Please post a new thread with the TCP Analyzer report.

[MadDoctor]

Good stuff Philip. It just keeps getting better and better!!!

[Skipper62]

Hi,
I just downloaded this program and when I ran it, a lot of the text is missing (labels) from the GUI screens(menu's). The buttons are not labelled. Almost all the selectable items are grayed out. I am using XP sp2. Any suggestions? I tried it on my Windows 2000 machine and the menu's have their labels.

[zatnkatel]

On Vista, the title bar reads Windows 2000. Given the fact the IP stack is rather different, is an updated version of TCP Optimizer needed/planned?

[shoreke]

Is there any real need to monkey with tweaking programs? IMHO, if you simply set MTU at 1500 and RWIN at 128480...your computer is fully armed, loaded and ready to handle anything Internet related.

[xonmob1]

Recently (meaning just last night) I had a service tech from Embarq trying to get my speed up to where I have been $$$$ for at 5000 kbs DSL...he even brought his laptop thinking it was my computer just to eliminate the possibility. Best he could do was about 3000....Frustrated but his time was up...end of the day..he left. After he left I miraculously found this forum and the TCP Optimizer WOW is the best way to explain myself Thanks to who wrote this program....I am getting 4700 consistently. GREAT TOOL!!!! Now I think I will charge EMBARQ!

[Philip]

Thanks for the positive feedback xonmob1, we try


zatnkatel: We're planning on updating the Optimizer for Vista, just that the underlying tweaks are not yet available/tested. Vista is better optimized for broadband by default, I'd wait for something reliable before tweaking it.

shoreke: You're right, those are the main settings, but some others help as well. Each setting in the Optimizer has its purpose for fine-tunning your connection - it's explained in the documentation, and some of the tweaking articles on the main site.

[ha1237]

I'll see if i can try it and see if there is any improvment on my internet. I am using dsl btw

[braindead]

thanks for share.

[braindead]

can any one tell me what to do after installation,means setting to be change,
yes i use bsnl(india)dataone broadband service.my modem is ut starcom(UT300R2U.

[trogers]

can any one tell me what to do after installation,means setting to be change,
yes i use bsnl(india)dataone broadband service.my modem is ut starcom(UT300R2U.

Post a new thread with your TCP Analyzer report. Also tell us what speed you have paid your ISP to give you.

[bryanlautt]

Is Speedguide going to update there program to work with Vistas new TCP/IP stack??

[QUOTE=Philip;1787847]We've released an updated version of the TCP Optimizer 2, including some minor improvements and bug fixes as described in the documentation. This version 2.0.3 is now the latest stable release.

It can be downloaded from here:

TCP Optimizer v 2.0.3 (01/06/2006)

Feel free to post any comments, feedback, or bug reports about the release in this thread.


The online documentation is available here: TCP Optimizer Documentation
List of updates and fixes can be found in Apendix A of the Documentation.
You can view previous updates and past issues with the program in the following threads:
version 2.0.2 final version 2.0.2 RC2 version 2.0.2 RC1 version 2.0.2 beta
version 2.0.1 final
version 2.0.0 final version 2 beta[/QUOT