Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: ADSL connection slow: SpeedTests/Ping - Results

  1. #1
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38

    ADSL connection slow: SpeedTests/Ping - Results

    I find that my ADSL is often slow? Very slow… only at night time it seems to perform better.
    I have an ADSL provider with the following connection service allocated to my account:
    Can you confirm that the following results are less satisfactory for this type of service connection?


    ADSL 640:
    •640 Kbps Download
    •128 Kbps upload
    OS: Win XP Pro SP2
    I.E: V. 6.0.2800 128-bit SP1

    At the bottom of the computer screen/ toolbar… appears the icon of the provider… it shows the following:
    •Upstream Downstream Rate (Kbps) Data Rate Transmit/Receive 192/832

    When I log on and I am connected an additional icon appears (the customary two small pc screens) always at the toolbar… showing: active connection Speed 832 Kbps. When looking the properties/details I find the following:
    •Device Name SpeedWeb USB ADSL Wan modem
    •Device type ISDN
    •Server Type PPP
    •Transport TCP/IP
    •Authentication PAP
    •Compression none
    •PPP multilink framing Off
    •Server …..
    •Client IP address …..

    Why does it report ISDN?? Can you explain…?

    Speed Test performance… as suggested by the provider I should only use this link as it happens to be very reliable!!
    http://help.virgilio.it/velox/ Select: TEST VELOCITA (speed test) a new graphic window appears (NetSpeed) and the results are shown at the bottom in red…
    It performed ten checks and I received the following result:

    16-Oct-2003 15:32:08 MISURE TERMINATE (end of test) Prove :10 Velocita' Media (medium velocity): 593.9606695585079Kbit/sec

    Ping Test performance: again as suggested by the provider I should only use the following:
    Therefore performing the above from dos I got the following results:

    Ping Test 1: 192.168.100.1

    Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
    (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
    Ping 192.168.100.1
    Pinging 192.168.100.1 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=255

    Ping statistics for 192.168.100.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 53ms, Average = 46ms

    Ping Test 2: www.ngi.it
    Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
    (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
    Ping www.ngi.it
    Pinging www.ngi.it [194.185.88.15] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=118

    Ping statistics for 194.185.88.15:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 40ms

    Speakeasy TEST
    http://det.speakeasy.net/
    2003-10-16 20:56:46 EST: 560 / 166
    Your download speed : 560160 bps, or 560 kbps.
    A 68.3 KB/sec transfer rate.
    Your upload speed : 166736 bps, or 166 kbps.

    SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer

    TCP options string = 020405ac0103030201010402
    MTU = 1492
    MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
    MSS = 1452
    MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput.
    Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 255552
    RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits (scale factor of 4)
    Unscaled Receive Window = 63888

    RWIN is a multiple of MSS
    Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
    511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
    127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
    63888 (MSS x 44)
    bandwidth * delay product:

    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 10222.08 kbps (1277.76 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 4088.832 kbps (511.104 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
    MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

    Time to live left = 56 hops

    TTL value is ok.
    Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

    Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

    IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000


    In short… is my connection delivering results to what this account specification are: ADSL 640:
    •640 Kbps Download
    •128 Kbps upload
    Can I improve it?
    I was suggested to download the following: TCP/IP Optimizer from Speed Guide: http://www.speedguide.net/files/TCPOptimizer.exe as one of the many free reliable software available?

    Has anyone got this software: TCPOptimizer?

    So I did download it… but somehow it is short of FAQ information’s! I am not sure what to select in order to tweak the system for a better performance?
    What do I select?
    •DSL in my case?

    Or…
    •DSL (PPPoE)?

    •Don’t modify Network Adapters? Yes/no

    •Or…
    •Modify All Network Adapters? Yes/no

    Many Thanks

  2. #2
    fem the retarded rabbit mccoffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    13,365
    Your speeds look ok Make sure your network card in 100full mode to do that look here
    Open Control Panel.
    * Double-click Network and Dial-up Connections.
    * Identify the icon for your cable modem connection: usually Local Area Connection.
    * Right-click that icon and select Properties.
    * Under the ethernet adapter icon, click the button Configure.
    * Click the tab Advanced to bring it to the front:
    * In the Property box, the property name to be selected varies according to model of ethernet card. Examples are: Network Link Selection, Media Type, Connection Type, Duplex Mode, or any similarly-named property which can have Values looking like Auto-Negotiation, or 10BT, or 10BaseT.
    * In the Value box, select a value which either (a) explicitly says say 100full
    Click OK to exit the Adapter settings.
    * Click OK to exit the Connection properties.





    if you think you could do better try the following in cablenut which is below me download install run the adjuster

    DefaultReceiveWindow = 81920
    DefaultSendWindow = 16384
    DisableAddressSharing = 1
    InitialLargeBufferCount = 200
    InitialMediumBufferCount = 480
    InitialSmallBufferCount = 640
    LargeBufferSize = 81920
    MaxFastTransmit = 64000
    MediumBufferSize = 15040
    PriorityBoost = 0
    SmallBufferSize = 1280
    TransmitWorker = 32
    FastSendDatagramThreshold = 4096
    EnableFastRouteLookup = 1
    EnablePMTUDiscovery = 1
    IgnorePushBitOnReceives = 0
    GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize =17424
    MaxFreeTcbs = 8000
    MaxHashTableSize = 16384
    MaxNormLookupMemory = 5000000
    SackOpts = 1
    SynAttackProtect = 1
    Tcp1323Opts = 1
    TcpLogLevel = 1
    TcpMaxDupAcks = 3
    TcpMaxHalfOpen = 100
    TcpMaxHalfOpenRetried = 80
    TcpRecvSegmentSize = 1452
    TcpSendSegmentSize = 1452
    TcpTimedWaitDelay = 30
    TcpUseRFC1122UrgentPointer = 0
    TcpWindowSize =17424
    MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server = 20
    MaxConnectionsPerServer = 10
    DefaultTTL = 64
    DisableUserTOSSetting = 0
    TcpMaxDataRetransmissions = 6
    DefaultTOSValue = 92
    Comptia a+ n+

  3. #3
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38

    ....

    Thanks...
    Here we are... see the results I got now after following your suggestions.

    Ping Test 1: 192.168.100.

    Pinging 192.168.100.1 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=255
    Ping statistics for 192.168.100.1:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 36ms


    Ping Test 2: www.ngi.it

    Ping www.ngi.it
    Pinging www.ngi.it [194.185.88.15] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118
    Ping statistics for 194.185.88.15:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 37ms


    SPEEDTEST

    2003-10-17 05:54:13 EST: 599 / 166
    Your download speed : 599434 bps, or 599 kbps.
    A 73.1 KB/sec transfer rate.
    Your upload speed : 166458 bps, or 166 kbps.


    SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer

    TCP options string = 020405ac0103030201010402
    MTU = 1492
    MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
    MSS = 1452
    MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput.
    Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 256960
    RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits (scale factor of 4)
    Unscaled Receive Window = 64240

    For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.
    Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
    511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
    255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
    127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
    63888 (MSS x 44)
    bandwidth * delay product:

    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 10278.4 kbps (1284.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 4111.36 kbps (513.92 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
    MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

    Time to live left = 56 hops

    TTL value is ok.
    Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

    Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

    IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000

    I there more I can do? does it look all OK?

    speedguide.net are the best... forget all the rest! ... if any to compare?

    Piccadilly


  4. #4
    fem the retarded rabbit mccoffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    13,365
    Why don't u try what i suggested
    Comptia a+ n+

  5. #5
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38

    ....

    1.5/256 dsl through ameriitech pppoe. linkyrouter win2k 256mbsddrram abit 1700 athalonxp
    Comptia a+ tech …
    Sorry… I am not sure what you mean? I have ADSL 640/128


    PS. I do not have a network card/Ethernet card! It is a dial up USB ADSL modem: http://www.thenet.it/thenet/ipm/modemusb.htm

    Make sure your network card in 100full mode to do that look here: cannot proceed because…
    *Under the Ethernet adapter icon, click the button Configure: = what I find here is the following: ISDN Configuration… Line type 64K digital negotiation line type
    *Click the tab Advanced to bring it to the front: here I find one choice being protect my computer and network by Internet connection firewall..? So I cannot implement your suggestion on this one.

    If you think you could do better try the following in cablenut which is below me download install run the adjuster:

    I will run the adjuster now… I will insert the values you have quoted above… hope all works out OK…

  6. #6
    fem the retarded rabbit mccoffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    13,365
    1.5/256 dsl through ameriitech pppoe. linkyrouter win2k 256mbsddrram abit 1700 athalonxp
    Comptia a+ tech …


    That's my specs / a+ tech certified to build and repair.


    Also see if you could get modem with ethernet later on that should help with speed.
    Comptia a+ n+

  7. #7
    fem the retarded rabbit mccoffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    13,365
    Do you have log on to use the internet??
    Comptia a+ n+

  8. #8
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38
    Ok I understand now.... well I have ordered a new service ADSL account "adsl 1200" but it will not be available until next month...
    Yes I do have to dial and log on...
    I had a look at the adjuster but it does not mention XP? it is for win 2000 pro and below?

  9. #9
    fem the retarded rabbit mccoffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    13,365
    use the 2k it doesnt matter 2k/xp same thing with cablenut. enter the vaules above.
    Comptia a+ n+

  10. #10
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38
    SPEED TEST

    2003-10-17 22:45:46 EST: 595 / 167
    Your download speed : 595030 bps, or 595 kbps.
    A 72.6 KB/sec transfer rate.
    Your upload speed : 167154 bps, or 167 kbps.

    TEST 1

    Pinging www.ngi.it :
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118
    Ping statistics for 194.185.88.15:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 40ms

    Here I am...


    TEST 2

    Pinging 192.168.100.1 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=255
    Ping statistics for 192.168.100.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 42ms, Average = 40ms



    TCP options string = 020405ac0103030001010402
    MTU = 1492
    MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
    MSS = 1452
    MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput.
    Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 17424
    RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
    Unscaled Receive Window = 17424

    RWIN is a multiple of MSS
    Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
    511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
    255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
    127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
    63888 (MSS x 44)
    bandwidth * delay product:

    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 696.96 kbps (87.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 278.784 kbps (34.848 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
    Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
    MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

    Time to live left = 56 hops

    TTL value is ok.
    Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

    Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

    IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 01011100

    Precedence (priority) = 100 (flash override)
    Delay = 1 (low delay)
    Throughput = 1 (high throughput)
    Reliability = 0 (normal reliability)
    Cost = 1 (low cost)


    Thanks for your reply

  11. #11
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38
    Test done today: after the changes made early this morning… I find that my pings have gone up! What does this mean? A suppose the higher they are! worse it is? Lower the better?
    However the provider speed test shows a very good result = 728.180 e.t.c. Medium speed!

    Speed Test 1
    At my provider site: http://help.virgilio.it/velox/ selected: TEST VELOCITA
    Result:
    18-Oct-2003 14:33:01 Test Terminated: on 10 tests Medium Velocity’ : 728.1808871876808Kbit/sec

    Speed Test 2
    At: http://chi.speakeasy.net/
    Result:
    2003-10-18 08:34:41 EST: 596 / 168
    your download speed: 596225 bps, or 596 kbps.
    A 72.7 KB/sec transfer rate.
    Your upload speed: 168847 bps, or 168 kbps.

    Ping Test 1
    Pinging 192.168.100.1 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=255
    Reply from 192.168.100.1: bytes=32 time=210ms TTL=255
    Ping statistics for 192.168.100.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 43ms, Maximum = 210ms, Average = 92ms

    Ping Test 2
    Pinging mail.gni.it [212.239.40.252] with 32 bytes of dat
    Reply from 212.239.40.252: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=54
    Reply from 212.239.40.252: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54
    Reply from 212.239.40.252: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=54
    Reply from 212.239.40.252: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=54
    Ping statistics for 212.239.40.252:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 54ms

    TCP options string = 020405ac0103030001010402
    MTU = 1492
    MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
    MSS = 1452
    MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput.
    Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 17424
    RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
    Unscaled Receive Window = 17424

    RWIN is a multiple of MSS
    Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
    511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
    255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
    127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
    63888 (MSS x 44)
    bandwidth * delay product:

    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 696.96 kbps (87.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 278.784 kbps (34.848 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
    Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
    MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

    Time to live left = 56 hops

    TTL value is ok.
    Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

    Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

    IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 01011100

    Precedence (priority) = 100 (flash override)
    Delay = 1 (low delay)
    Throughput = 1 (high throughput)
    Reliability = 0 (normal reliability)
    Cost = 1 (low cost)

    Thanks for you help
    Regards

  12. #12
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38
    to follow:... the Speed is very good! I never had such speed of:

    Speed Test 1
    At my provider site: http://help.virgilio.it/velox/ selected: TEST VELOCITA
    Result:
    18-Oct-2003 14:33:01 MISURE TERMINATE Prove: 10 Velocity’ Media :728.1808871876808Kbit/sec

    Speed Test 2
    18-Oct-2003 15:54:20 MISURE TERMINATE Prove :10 Velocita' Media :728.7523145855841Kbit/sec

    Speed Test 3
    18-Oct-2003 16:24:39 MISURE TERMINATE Prove :10 Velocita' Media :728.704792583212Kbit/sec

    This results obtained from my provider... on an Italian site….

    The pings is what I do not understand why so high now?

    Another question for your patience! Has the “RWIN” Value got anything to do with it? Should it be higher?
    I ask this because I did some reading but cannot make out clearly what to do?
    Thanks

  13. #13
    fem the retarded rabbit mccoffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    13,365
    Rwin has nothing to do with ping
    Rwin has nothing to do with ping. Ping is sent out from isp/line qualty there is nothing you could about ping but to rewire the phone wirring/
    Comptia a+ n+

  14. #14
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38
    So I will leave all as it is... (TCP options )...
    I take it you are satisfied with the settings above?
    Many Thanks

  15. #15
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38

    ....

    Hallo mccoffee...
    All seems to be fine… pings are also low now… always 35/45/50…
    Just a question on the RWIN value… I was suggested that the RWIN should be increased… as it could be same as mss x 22? As what I have now is a little low?
    What do I do? Leave it as it is? Or does it make sense!
    Thanks again

    TCP options string = 020405ac0103030001010402
    MTU = 1492
    MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.
    MSS = 1452
    MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for maximum throughput.
    Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 17424
    RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
    Unscaled Receive Window = 17424

    RWIN is a multiple of MSS
    Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
    511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
    255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
    127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
    63888 (MSS x 44)
    bandwidth * delay product:

    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 696.96 kbps (87.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
    Your RcvWindow limits you to: 278.784 kbps (34.848 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
    Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
    MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

    Time to live left = 56 hops

    TTL value is ok.
    Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

    Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

    IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 01011100

    Precedence (priority) = 100 (flash override)
    Delay = 1 (low delay)
    Throughput = 1 (high throughput)
    Reliability = 0 (normal reliability)
    Cost = 1 (low cost)

  16. #16
    fem the retarded rabbit mccoffee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    13,365
    Rwin has nothing to do with ping lowering or rasing

    keep ur rwin low If you have lower ping or latency on the line you wan a low rwin. If you have higher ping or latency you want a higher rwin.

    Don't worry about adjust rwin if you speeds go down then hit me up don't go by ping or latency go by speed test.
    Comptia a+ n+

  17. #17
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    I shall keep it as it is...

    I will need your help again once the adsl 1200 arrives

  18. #18
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38

    Ping & Tracert:

    I am trying to optimize my understanding on the ADSL connection results status…

    What’s the difference in understanding results obtained by doing the following?

    • Ping or Pinging = seems to be OK… well below a 100 ms
    • Tracert = I don’t understand why number: 4 & 9 are so high?

    These tests give us an idea on how one connection is… good - bad or what?

    1) Ping test: Current but fluctuating results each time I ping…

    Pinging www.ngi.it [194.185.88.15] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=118
    Ping statistics for 194.185.88.15:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 44ms

    2) Ping test:

    Pinging www.ngi.it [194.185.88.15] with 32 bytes of data:
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118
    Reply from 194.185.88.15: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=118
    Ping statistics for 194.185.88.15:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 39ms


    1) First Trace test: Current but fluctuating results each time I trace…

    Tracing route to www.ngi.it [194.185.88.15]
    Over a maximum of 30 hops:
    1 37 ms 39 ms 39 ms 192.168.100.1
    2 40 ms 39 ms 39 ms 217.141.110.138
    3 48 ms 49 ms 49 ms 151.99.99.93
    4 226 ms 219 ms 229 ms 151.99.75.163
    5 44 ms 49 ms 49 ms 80.17.211.198
    6 42 ms 39 ms 39 ms 217.29.73.2
    7 40 ms 49 ms 39 ms 194.185.46.164
    8 * 42 ms 49 ms 213.92.7.3
    9 190 ms 189 ms 189 ms 213.92.34.19
    10 58 ms 59 ms 59 ms 194.185.88.249
    11 46 ms 49 ms 49 ms 194.185.88.15
    Trace complete.


    2) Second Trace test: Current but fluctuating results each time I trace…

    Tracing route to www.ngi.it [194.185.88.15]
    Over a maximum of 30 hops:
    1 45 ms 39 ms 39 ms 192.168.100.1
    2 38 ms 39 ms 39 ms 217.141.110.138
    3 45 ms 49 ms 49 ms 151.99.99.93
    4 224 ms 229 ms 229 ms 151.99.75.163
    5 41 ms 49 ms 49 ms 80.17.211.198
    6 40 ms 39 ms 39 ms 217.29.73.2
    7 * 42 ms 49 ms 194.185.46.164
    8 50 ms 49 ms 49 ms 213.92.7.3
    9 198 ms 199 ms 199 ms 213.92.34.19
    10 53 ms 49 ms 49 ms 194.185.88.249
    11 41 ms 49 ms 49 ms 194.185.88.15
    Trace complete.

    Being a 640/128 connection service:
    This is the current speed:
    24-Oct-2003 16:57:16 (728.1358252829822Kbit/sec) Length: 1302447byte

    Thanks

  19. #19
    Junior Member piccadilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    38
    Have a look at this results! at 127.0.0.1

    Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<ms TTL=64
    Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<ms TTL=64
    Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<ms TTL=64
    Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<ms TTL=64

    Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms



    Tracing route to localhost [127.0.0.1]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <1ms <1 ms <1 ms localhost [127.0.0.1]

    Trace complete.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •