PDA

View Full Version : FAQ: Maximizing cable modem or DSL speed



John Navas
12-29-08, 11:37 AM
Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
Should I use one of those tweaking programs?

A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
<http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.

riggor9999
12-29-08, 05:48 PM
"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:NdCdnQG03c4pYcXUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@giganews.com...
> Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
> Should I use one of those tweaking programs?
>
> A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
> <http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.

John -

That's three postings in December!! How about for 2009 you make a
resolution to ease off the posting of your spam???

Bill M.
12-29-08, 06:56 PM
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:48:54 -0500, "riggor9999"
<riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:NdCdnQG03c4pYcXUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@giganews.com...
>> Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
>> Should I use one of those tweaking programs?
>>
>> A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
>> <http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.
>
>John -
>
>That's three postings in December!! How about for 2009 you make a
>resolution to ease off the posting of your spam???

Adding alt.internet.wireless since I think he hangs out there.
Hopefully he will do the right thing and turn this autoposting off.

--
Bill

John Navas
12-29-08, 07:24 PM
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:56:33 -0600, Bill M. <wbillups@hotmail.com> wrote
in <aioil49l6jl5b0vq020va5u6n8eeaf3hv9@4ax.com>:

>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:48:54 -0500, "riggor9999"
><riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>news:NdCdnQG03c4pYcXUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
>>> Should I use one of those tweaking programs?
>>>
>>> A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
>>> <http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.

>>That's three postings in December!! How about for 2009 you make a
>>resolution to ease off the posting of your spam???

It's posted every two weeks in accordance with Usenet guidelines, and
isn't spam.

>Adding alt.internet.wireless since I think he hangs out there.

Great example -- you could and should have used email, but instead you
made an off-topic post here.

>Hopefully he will do the right thing and turn this autoposting off.

I will continue to do the right thing by posting it.

--
Very best wishes for the holiday season and for the coming new year,
John

Not Me
12-29-08, 07:31 PM
John Navas wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:56:33 -0600, Bill M. <wbillups@hotmail.com> wrote
> in <aioil49l6jl5b0vq020va5u6n8eeaf3hv9@4ax.com>:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:48:54 -0500, "riggor9999"
>> <riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>> news:NdCdnQG03c4pYcXUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>> Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
>>>> Should I use one of those tweaking programs?
>>>>
>>>> A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
>>>> <http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.
>
>>> That's three postings in December!! How about for 2009 you make a
>>> resolution to ease off the posting of your spam???
>
> It's posted every two weeks in accordance with Usenet guidelines, and
> isn't spam.
>
>> Adding alt.internet.wireless since I think he hangs out there.
>
> Great example -- you could and should have used email, but instead you
> made an off-topic post here.
>
>> Hopefully he will do the right thing and turn this autoposting off.
>
> I will continue to do the right thing by posting it.
>


This would be hilarious, if it were not so sad. He displays the same,
100% repeated, aberrant behavior in each and every newsgroup he trolls.
Some of which he purposely created -- in which to troll.

A behavior like Nathan Thurm, the SNL character played by Martin Short.

A shady lawyer, Thurm was a chain-smoker, quite paranoid, and constantly
in denial about his paranoia. "I'm not being defensive. You're the one
who's being defensive."

When questioned, his catch phrase often included, "It's so funny to me
that you would think..." He would also look into the camera and express
his puzzlement at the questioner by asking, "Is it me, or is it him?
It's him, right?"

Other times, he would deny an accusation, then immediately reverse his
position when the accuser reaffirmed the statement. "No, it isn't!"
("Yes it is.") "I know that! Why wouldn't I know that? I'm well aware of
that!"

Imagine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLBQxk72NY

John Navas
12-29-08, 08:39 PM
Off-topic and abusive cross-posting.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Usenet troll.

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:31:30 -0500, Not Me <Not.Me@Home.Base> wrote in
<7O-dndLEl_FC9sTUnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@speakeasy.net>:

>[SNIP]

Bill M.
12-29-08, 08:59 PM
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:24:20 -0800, John Navas
<spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:56:33 -0600, Bill M. <wbillups@hotmail.com> wrote
>in <aioil49l6jl5b0vq020va5u6n8eeaf3hv9@4ax.com>:
>
>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:48:54 -0500, "riggor9999"
>><riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>>news:NdCdnQG03c4pYcXUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>> Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
>>>> Should I use one of those tweaking programs?
>>>>
>>>> A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
>>>> <http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.
>
>>>That's three postings in December!! How about for 2009 you make a
>>>resolution to ease off the posting of your spam???
>
>It's posted every two weeks in accordance with Usenet guidelines, and
>isn't spam.

So you say.

>>Adding alt.internet.wireless since I think he hangs out there.
>
>Great example -- you could and should have used email, but instead you
>made an off-topic post here.

Email is best used for one on one communication. This is clearly not
that type of situation, so email wouldn't have been appropriate.

>>Hopefully he will do the right thing and turn this autoposting off.
>
>I will continue to do the right thing by posting it.

*groan* Well, obviously a polite nudge didn't work, but I'm
optimistic that you'll eventually see the light.

--
Bill

John Navas
12-29-08, 09:22 PM
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:59:41 -0600, Bill M. <wbillups@hotmail.com> wrote
in <ltvil490ifblsqkcq88dlfgn9q1rutarbr@4ax.com>:

>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:24:20 -0800, John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

>>>Adding alt.internet.wireless since I think he hangs out there.
>>
>>Great example -- you could and should have used email, but instead you
>>made an off-topic post here.
>
>Email is best used for one on one communication. This is clearly not
>that type of situation, so email wouldn't have been appropriate.

What you're doing is what's not appropriate, and you know it.

>>>Hopefully he will do the right thing and turn this autoposting off.
>>
>>I will continue to do the right thing by posting it.
>
>*groan* Well, obviously a polite nudge didn't work, but I'm
>optimistic that you'll eventually see the light.

I've been posting it since 1999. I can't image why you would think your
own personal annoyance is going to suddenly make me stop. Get serious.
Learn how to filter.

--
Very best wishes for the holiday season and for the coming new year,
John

riggor9999
12-29-08, 11:14 PM
<SNIP>
> Learn how to filter.
>

I guess that's the tell tale statement right there .... you continue to post
your self serving / self promoting web page ... which is so obsolete and out
of date that it cannot serve any practical purpose ... and yet rather than
"doing the right thing" and stopping ... you place the onus on everyone else
to filter you and your useless post.

DanS
12-30-08, 09:08 AM
"riggor9999" <riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote in
news:gjc81m$il7$1@news.motzarella.org:

>> I will continue to do the right thing by posting it.
>
>
> John - can you please answer for us two questions:
>
> 1) What is exactly "the right thing" you think are doing by posting?
>
> 2) Why do you post the same thing every two weeks? What is the
> purpose / intent?

Ego feeding ?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ari=AE?=
12-30-08, 10:45 AM
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:56:33 -0600, Bill M. wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:48:54 -0500, "riggor9999"
> <riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>news:NdCdnQG03c4pYcXUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
>>> Should I use one of those tweaking programs?
>>>
>>> A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
>>> <http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.
>>
>>John -
>>
>>That's three postings in December!! How about for 2009 you make a
>>resolution to ease off the posting of your spam???
>
> Adding alt.internet.wireless since I think he hangs out there.
> Hopefully he will do the right thing and turn this autoposting off.

Bill, please visit here with your penis.

http://bluwiki.com/go/WirelessPenisNavas
--
Meet Ari! http://tr.im/1fa3
"To get concrete results, you have to be confrontational".

Constable Leonovich
12-30-08, 10:46 AM
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:24:20 -0800, John Navas wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:56:33 -0600, Bill M. <wbillups@hotmail.com> wrote
> in <aioil49l6jl5b0vq020va5u6n8eeaf3hv9@4ax.com>:
>
>>On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:48:54 -0500, "riggor9999"
>><riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>>news:NdCdnQG03c4pYcXUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>> Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
>>>> Should I use one of those tweaking programs?
>>>>
>>>> A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
>>>> <http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.
>
>>>That's three postings in December!! How about for 2009 you make a
>>>resolution to ease off the posting of your spam???
>
> It's posted every two weeks in accordance with Usenet guidelines, and
> isn't spam.
>
>>Adding alt.internet.wireless since I think he hangs out there.
>
> Great example -- you could and should have used email, but instead you
> made an off-topic post here.
>
>>Hopefully he will do the right thing and turn this autoposting off.
>
> I will continue to do the right thing by posting this below.

> http://bluwiki.com/go/WirelessPenisNavas
--
http://www.tronguy.net (Yeppers, that's me!!)
http://current.com/items/88931310_tron_guy

John Navas
12-30-08, 10:49 AM
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:28:39 -0500, "riggor9999"
<riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote in
<gjc81m$il7$1@news.motzarella.org>:

>John - can you please answer for us two questions:
>
>1) What is exactly "the right thing" you think are doing by posting?
>
>2) Why do you post the same thing every two weeks? What is the purpose /
>intent?

I'm not going to continue something deliberately and rudely posted to
off-topic newsgroups. I'm done with this thread.

--
Very best wishes for the holiday season and for the coming new year,
John

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ari=AE?=
12-30-08, 11:07 AM
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:31:30 -0500, Not Me wrote:

> John Navas wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:56:33 -0600, Bill M. <wbillups@hotmail.com> wrote
>> in <aioil49l6jl5b0vq020va5u6n8eeaf3hv9@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:48:54 -0500, "riggor9999"
>>> <riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:NdCdnQG03c4pYcXUnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>> Q: How do I get the maximum possible DSL or cable modem speed?
>>>>> Should I use one of those tweaking programs?
>>>>>
>>>>> A: See the Navas Cable Modem/DSL Tuning Guide at
>>>>> <http://cable-dsl.navasgroup.com/>.
>>
>>>> That's three postings in December!! How about for 2009 you make a
>>>> resolution to ease off the posting of your spam???
>>
>> It's posted every two weeks in accordance with Usenet guidelines, and
>> isn't spam.
>>
>>> Adding alt.internet.wireless since I think he hangs out there.
>>
>> Great example -- you could and should have used email, but instead you
>> made an off-topic post here.
>>
>>> Hopefully he will do the right thing and turn this autoposting off.
>>
>> I will continue to do the right thing by posting it.
>>
>
> This would be hilarious, if it were not so sad. He displays the same,
> 100% repeated, aberrant behavior in each and every newsgroup he trolls.
> Some of which he purposely created -- in which to troll.
>
> A behavior like Nathan Thurm, the SNL character played by Martin Short.
>
> A shady lawyer, Thurm was a chain-smoker, quite paranoid, and constantly
> in denial about his paranoia. "I'm not being defensive. You're the one
> who's being defensive."
>
> When questioned, his catch phrase often included, "It's so funny to me
> that you would think..." He would also look into the camera and express
> his puzzlement at the questioner by asking, "Is it me, or is it him?
> It's him, right?"
>
> Other times, he would deny an accusation, then immediately reverse his
> position when the accuser reaffirmed the statement. "No, it isn't!"
> ("Yes it is.") "I know that! Why wouldn't I know that? I'm well aware of
> that!"
>
> Imagine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLBQxk72NY

This should clear everything up.

http://bluwiki.com/go/WirelessPenisNavas
--
Meet Ari! http://tr.im/1fa3
"To get concrete results, you have to be confrontational".

riggor9999
12-30-08, 10:44 PM
"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:tmgkl49qikg07pd38bknol0ic4avulqco5@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:28:39 -0500, "riggor9999"
> <riggor9999@nospam_yahoo.com> wrote in
> <gjc81m$il7$1@news.motzarella.org>:
>
>>John - can you please answer for us two questions:
>>
>>1) What is exactly "the right thing" you think are doing by posting?
>>
>>2) Why do you post the same thing every two weeks? What is the purpose /
>>intent?
>
> I'm not going to continue something deliberately and rudely posted to
> off-topic newsgroups. I'm done with this thread.
>

I don't see how this is off topic as it is a direct question regarding your
posts, and a direct question to your statements .... nor do I see anything
"rude" in my post / questions ...

Will you at lest update the content of your web page so it does not refer to
obsolete hardware / software? Update it so it is actually relevant and
useful for 2009 versus 1999?