News Glossary of Terms FAQs Polls Cool Links SpeedGuide Teams SG Premium Services SG Gear Store
Registry Tweaks Broadband Tools Downloads/Patches Broadband Hardware SG Ports Database Security Default Passwords User Stories
Broadband Routers Wireless Firewalls / VPNs Software Hardware User Reviews
Broadband Security Editorials General User Articles Quick Reference
Broadband Forums General Discussions
Advertising Awards Link to us Server Statistics Helping SG About
The Broadband Guide
SG
search advanced
 Username:
 Password:
Register
 forgot your password?

Tiny Software Personal Firewall v1.0

A great ICSA certified software firewall
Quick Index: 
Date: 2000.07.26 10:43
Author: S. McDougall
Category: Software
Manufacturer: Tiny Software
Product/Model: Personal Firewall
List Price: $29.00

Testing

The first thing I wanted to see was how big of an impact the Firewall software would have on network performance. I just did one test and decided to use the Thief2 demo from Download.com as a testing platform. It's a very large demo (130MB), that isn't downloaded too frequently anymore. It seems the demos real home is the FTP server of Dailyradar now though.

I started the downloads and stooped them about 30 seconds later (after things had stabilized). There was less than a 1% difference in speed with the Firewall running, so there was almost no impact on throughput because of the Firewall. On the flip side, home Firewalls like Norton's Internet Security 2000 (more features but twice the price - and they didn't write the Firewall, they bought AtGuard out), is a now violator of bandwidth. Not to mention it's installation is like exploding a can of Norton spray paint on your registry (I hate that).

My first stop on the security checklist was Steve Gibson's Shields Up test:

Click to expand
That would be a perfect score from Shields Up port probe test. Not only that but, unless you approve a request, all of your ports won't respond at all to unsolicited requests. This will make you invisible to hackers, or anyone running a port scanner.
Click to expand
do need to point out that at the standard "normal" security settings, you will be asked if you wish to allow communications requests. This happened frequently while security testing. However, if you're not around to approve the request, nothing will happen anyway. I do like being given the choice.

Now it's time for the grand finale..... the mother of all security scans: Secure-Me's full (paid for) scan, which covers so much more ground than anything else I've seen. We'll get: a Fragmented IP test, the deadly pings of death, some web exploitation scanning action, an SMTP (mail port) scan, and a full TCP and a UDP scan all in one (as well as some other stuff).

I should point out here that ) if you are running your system without a Firewall of some type, Microsoft OS's do almost nothing to protect you (especially if you have Cable or xDSL). You might has well just take your computer over to a hackers house and leave it on the doorstep. I actually felt somewhat creepy while the "naked" tests were running. I don't like feeling that "exposed" with an always on connection. I usually log 10-20 attacks per day, and sometimes much more.

Click to expand
I've tested a lot of Firewalls (hard and soft - insert joke here), and a score of "0" is very rare for anything a normal human can afford for home use.

Look at that...... "smack"

I've tested a lot of Firewalls (hard and soft - insert joke here), and a score of "0" is very rare for anything a normal human can afford for home use.

Again, if "normal" security settings are selected you will be questioned on every unsolicited request. Normally this will be a rare occurrences, and I think it is much better to get a choice.

Let's wrap things up

Previous page  1 | 2 | 3 | 4  Next page top
  Post your review/comments
    rate:
   avg:
comment print discuss top

exec. time: 0.00583 s
Copyright © 1998-2014 Speed Guide, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy