SG Broadband Community

Please do not add on to this thread








No BufferMultiplier in above tests

2002-08-12 13:03:51 EST: 3159 / 352
Your download speed : 3159155 bps, or 3159 kbps.
A 385.6 KB/sec transfer rate.
Your upload speed : 352236 bps, or 352 kbps.
Seems like broadband .. above the 1mbit barrier!


And yes SG's Optimizer is installed too, must have



Turn everything off, Firewalls, scanners, virus scanners, ICQ, AIM, everything.


Please do not add on to this thread

The minimum of MaxHashTableSize is 64 (0x40).

Thats what Bill says:

Please do not add on to this thread

Set to 0

Originally posted by Lobo
Thats what Bill says:

See here you go again posting a value that isn't even valid.

MaxHashTableSize - This value should be set to a power of 2 (for example, 512, 1024, 2048, and so on.) If this value is not a power of 2, the system configures the hash table to the next power of 2 value (for example, a setting of 513 is rounded up to 1024.) This value controls how fast the system can find a TCP control block and should be increased if MaxFreeTcbs is increased from the default.

Value Type: REG_DWORD—number (must be a power of 2)

Valid Range: 0x40–0x10000 (64-65536 decimal)

Default: 512

Read, did you miss this:

Please do not add on to this thread

32 is faster for me Enough on this thread

Originally posted by Lobo
Read, did you miss this:

32 is faster for me Enough on this thread

LMAO, that's OK if you don't know the valid values for each parameter there is a link to them in my thread Help & Tips.

Bill G. is God

Originally posted by Lobo
Bill G. is God

LMAO

Actually there is only one God, besides Bill didn't write this stuff he just owns the company..... but I bet he could explain it. LMAO

So I should use 64 and go slower

HMMMM, do I need to explain everything? If you put in a value that isn't legit it is just ignored..... so the value you are using doesn't do anything. If you know so much about tweaking then why are you daily (actually hourly) changing your settings and posting another speed test result with the new settings? Just set them and leave it alone already, nobody cares what kind of speeds you get they want more speed and need help in doing that. So quit posting these stupid WOOT threads and start helping people and explaining what they ask.

Look above and see, Nothing it is then

Originally posted by Lobo
Look above and see, Nothing it is then

What does that mean? If you are going to reply then reply in plain English. I mean Lobo these type of threads are useless and help nobody, the new Winguides tweaks are helpful and contain some good information but give these ridiculous "WOW look at my speed" threads a rest.

If it is ignored, why is it in registry?

Originally posted by Lobo
If it is ignored, why is it in registry?

You will NEVER EVER understand things will you, just because it's there doesn't mean Windows will use it. HMMM let's see why don't you change your TcpReceiveWindow to a string value instead of a DWORD value and see if it works..... but wait it's still in the registry so why won't it work? Because it's not valid - that's why.

Show me where it says it won't use it, this is fun

LMAO

You are such a moron, didn't I post above what the VALID range of values for this parameter are?? You just like to make up stuff and think it's right.... I mean you really do just make up settings and such and tell people to use them - get a CLUE, you are making yourself look like an idiot.

When I change something and it's faster, what do I do, go slower and do it Bill's way?

Originally posted by Lobo
When I change something and it's faster, what do I do, go slower and do it Bill's way?

It's NOT Bill's way, it's the way it was written to work. You can't just put random numbers you make up and expect things to work. Go ahead and do what I said and change your TcpReceiveWindow to a string value - it'll work because according to you..... "it shows up in the registry". LMAO

Even the noobies are gonna know your clueless.

Keep up the good work.

You said it ignored it, show me where it says that

Show me Mr, Internet for Dummies

People can try them or yours, whatever:


AznStyl
Regular Member

Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 204
Ok, this is what i think of Lobo and Mnosteele52 tweaks. They both work greats but Lobo Tweak is faster on the FTP speed and Mnosteele52 is faster on the HTTP tweak. Everytime i try Lobo .. the ftp speed seem to be faster and Mnosteele52 tweak the Http seem to be faster.

That's what i think.

OK I'm getting ebarrassed for you please stop it before 2 guys in white suits come in and take you away. You will NEVER understand anything no matter what I say, just save what little face you have and stop..... people are reading this you know. LMAO

You can't show me Suh, Hmmm, 2 french maids to haul me off, as long as they have AOL

What you are saying is slow down and do it like the book says, NEVER

If there is a valid range of values for a certain parameter and you put in a value that is not within that range what would you call it..... INVALID. Please stop making yourself look so dumb, I mean come on this is Basic Computing 101, you have been posting here for how many years and still don't understand this stuff...... then nothing I say is going to help you. Just keep you ****amamie ideas to yourself and quit giving out inaccurate information to people who don't know any better.

HMMM, I haven't seen you recommend those ridiculous size RWINs to anyone lately.... I wonder why? Maybe because your ridiculous "theory" of cpu & RAM isn't right?

Or maybe you actually did learn something.

I can go back and get some of yours, show me suh, ignored

Enough dude, let people do as they wish